Ideal gas: total kinetic energy of molecules striking a vessel's wall

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total kinetic energy of gas molecules striking a vessel's wall per unit area and time. The number of collisions is derived from the Maxwellian distribution, leading to the expression for the collision rate. The user seeks to determine the average velocity of the molecules to compute the kinetic energy, suspecting that the mean-square velocity is related to temperature and mass. They recognize that the x and y components contribute to the average velocity but are uncertain about integrating the z-component correctly. The conversation highlights the challenge of deriving the mean-square velocity from the Maxwellian distribution to arrive at the correct kinetic energy formula.
mSSM
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Molecules in an ideal gas contained in a vessel are striking the vessels wall. I am trying to find the total kinetic energy of gas molecules striking a unit area of that well per unit time.

The number of collisions per unit area per unit time is derived from the normalized Maxwellian distribution of molecules per unit volume:
<br /> \mathrm{d}N_v = \frac{N}{V} \frac{m^{3/2}}{(2\pi T)^{3/2}} \exp\left[ -m(v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2)/2T \right] \mathrm{d}v_x \mathrm{d}v_y \mathrm{d}v_z<br />

The number of collisions per unit area per unit time is then just obtained by multiplying dN_v by the volume of a cylinder of unit base area and height v_z (we imagine that an element of surface area of the vessel wall is perpendicular to some coordinate system's z-axis):
<br /> \mathrm{d}\nu_{\vec{v}} = \frac{N}{V} \left(\frac{m}{2\pi T}\right)^{3/2} \exp\left[ -m(v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2)/2T \right] v_z \mathrm{d}v_x \mathrm{d}v_y \mathrm{d}v_z

The total number of impacts of gas molecules per unit area per unit time on the vessel is then just obtained by integrating over all velocities; the z-component of velocity is integrated only from 0 to \infty, because negative velocities would mean that a molecule is going away from the wall:
<br /> \nu = \frac{N}{V} \sqrt{\frac{T}{2\pi m}}<br />

Now, from here I actually want to calculate the total kinetic energy of the gas molecules striking unit area of the wall per unit time. I thought this would just be:
E = \nu \frac{1}{2} m \overline{v^2}.

However, I am not sure how to properly calculate the average velocity, since I have to take care of the integration of the z-component.

I know the result is:
E = \frac{N}{V} \sqrt{\frac{2T^3}{m\pi}},
which, if my above idea is correct, would just mean that my mean-square velocity would have to be:
\overline{v^2} = 4 \frac{T}{m}

However, I have no idea how I am supposed to obtain that.

The x and y components of velocity would both give \frac{T}{m}, of course assuming Maxwellian distribution. That leaves me with 2\frac{T}{m}, which I have no idea where to take from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top