MHB Ideals in Q[x, y] .... Cox, Little and O'Shea, Chapter 1 Section 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading the undergraduate introduction to algebraic geometry entitled "Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra (Third Edition) by David Cox, John Little and Donal O'Shea ... ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 1, Section 4: Ideals ... ... and need help with Exercise 3(c) which reads as follows:
View attachment 5672I would be grateful if someone could help me with Exercise 3c ...

Help will be appreciated ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Peter said:
I would be grateful if someone could help me with Exercise 3c ...

We want to show that each ideal contains the other, and, according to Problem 2, it suffices to show that the generators of one ideal are elements of the other ideal. With this in mind, try writing $x^2 - 4$ and $y^2 -1$ as elements of $\langle 2x^2 + 3y^2 -11, x^2 - y^2 -3\rangle$, which will prove $\langle x^2 - 4, y^2 - 1\rangle \subseteq \langle 2x^2 + 3y^2 -11, x^2 - y^2 -3\rangle.$ Then do the analogous thing to prove the opposite containment.

Let me know if you have any questions. Good luck!
 
GJA said:
Hi Peter,
We want to show that each ideal contains the other, and, according to Problem 2, it suffices to show that the generators of one ideal are elements of the other ideal. With this in mind, try writing $x^2 - 4$ and $y^2 -1$ as elements of $\langle 2x^2 + 3y^2 -11, x^2 - y^2 -3\rangle$, which will prove $\langle x^2 - 4, y^2 - 1\rangle \subseteq \langle 2x^2 + 3y^2 -11, x^2 - y^2 -3\rangle.$ Then do the analogous thing to prove the opposite containment.

Let me know if you have any questions. Good luck!
Thanks GJA ...

That bit of help and encouragement enabled me to solve the problem ...

... thanks again ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K