Identifying System Equality Across Observers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Logic Cloud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
Two observers moving relative to each other can measure a system to determine if they are observing the same entity. They can compare measurements of time and position, but this requires understanding transformation laws like Galilean or Lorentz transformations. The discussion raises the question of whether it's possible to identify the same system without prior knowledge of these laws. Observers might only see a copy of the system, complicating their ability to confirm they are observing the same one. Ultimately, understanding the properties that define a system is crucial for different observers to reach a conclusion.
Logic Cloud
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Say we have two separated observers which have a velocity relative to each other and are both looking at a system. By a system, I mean simple systems as encountered in mechanics. They want to determine if they are looking at the same system or not. They can perform measurements on the system without disturbing it and they can communicate their results with each other. Is there a way for the observers to determine whether the systems they are looking at are in fact the same system or not?

Of course, they could compare measurements for time and position and see if the results are linked by a Galilean or Lorentz transformation. However, it seems to me you shouldn't have to have knowledge of some transformation law before you can determine if you are seeing the same system or not. In other words: which properties determine a system, taking into account different observers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They can always see a copy of a system instead of the same system, with no way to figure that out unless they are allowed to manipulate the system.
However, it seems to me you shouldn't have to have knowledge of some transformation law before you can determine if you are seeing the same system or not.
You need this knowledge, otherwise you don't understand (fast) moving objects.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
958
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
445
Replies
33
Views
4K
Back
Top