I am trying to follow a derivation in a book which is written without bra-ket notation, and presumably without the concept of state vectors. I can easily follow it if I may use the fact that [itex]\sum_{n}|\varphi_{n}\rangle\langle\varphi_{n}|[/itex] is the identity operator.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Analogously to the way I would prove that the above expression is the identity operator: I write [itex]\psi=\sum_{n}c_{n}\varphi_{n}[/itex] as the expansion of a wavefunction on the complete basis set [itex]\varphi_{n}[/itex]. If I use the fact that [itex]c_{m}=\int\varphi^{*}_{m}\psi d^{3}\textbf{r}[/itex], I can write [itex]\psi=\sum_{n}\varphi_{n}\int\varphi^{*}_{n}\psi d^{3}\textbf{r}[/itex]. The statement which I would like to prove is identical to this, If I replace [itex]\psi[/itex] on both sides by another expression [itex]\hat{w}\varphi_{n}[/itex]. Thus I would like to extract [itex]\psi[/itex] from the RHS and equate the rest of the expression to identity. How can I do this? The operator [itex]\hat{w}[/itex] has no special relation to the basis functions [itex]\varphi_{n}[/itex].

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Identity operator

Loading...

Similar Threads - Identity operator | Date |
---|---|

A Operator identity | Jan 27, 2018 |

Identity operator | Dec 6, 2012 |

Why is the cube of a unitary operator = identity matrix? | May 11, 2011 |

An identity for functions of operators | Nov 23, 2010 |

Spin-1 operator identity | Jan 22, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**