IEC 60529 Definition of "Finger Safe" for Cylinders

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of "Finger Safe" as per IEC 60529, specifically regarding the IP2X rating which mandates that objects with diameters greater than 12.5mm should not allow access to hazardous parts. The inquiry focuses on whether this implies a specific design for cylinders exceeding 12.5mm in diameter, including considerations for radius and length. The application context is for industrial robots used in high-power welding, where compliance with IP2X is critical for safety and legal protection against potential liabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of IEC 60529 standards
  • Familiarity with IP ratings, specifically IP2X
  • Knowledge of industrial robot safety requirements
  • Experience with high-power welding applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research IEC 60529 for detailed specifications on IP2X ratings
  • Explore design guidelines for "Finger Safe" enclosures in industrial applications
  • Investigate safety compliance measures for industrial robots in welding environments
  • Review case studies on legal implications of safety standards in manufacturing
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, safety compliance officers, and industrial designers involved in the development and implementation of safety standards for robotic systems and high-power machinery.

DTM
Messages
75
Reaction score
9
"Finger Safe"

I'm searching for a precise definition of "Finger Safe" according to IEC 60529 which defines
IP2X as "finger safe" for diameters > 12.5mm. Does thes mean a cylinder of > 12.5mm dia. an not touch the contact? Or is there a radius on the end of the cylinder? How long is the cylinder? Anyone have link to a drawing that better defines this 12.5mm "finger"

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


I remember way back when having to machine a "finger probe" and a "tool probe" to make UL happy. I searched and found that this place sells a variety of similar probes.
http://www.ergonomicsusa.com/
 


Thanks Mike. That site did have lots of finger probes but none of the specific IP rating I need to meet, IP2X from IEC 60529. Anyone else know of where I might find details of the IP2X finger?
 


Are you trying to make it finger safe for a one year-old?
 


I tried the Google search. Only found lots of products that say their "finger safe" or meet IP2X rating. Thanks for the link to the Amateur radio site, but no copy of IEC 60529 there either.

This application is for an industrial robot. The contacts are for high power welding. They shouldn't ever be powered up when the robot is not attached to the welder and the contacts are exposed, but just in case you don't want to accidently be able to touch it and most of our customers require the IP2X level of protection for safety. We have an approximately 6mm annulus gap, but it's not very deep. Anyone who tries can get at least the tip of their pinky in there. Now someone is going to say, how idiot proof does it need to be? The answer, as idiot proof as the IEC spec requires. That provides some legal protection from eventual lawsuits from said idiots.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Writing: Input Wanted Generation Ship SFV Exodus: Revised Designs
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Undergrad Atmospheric Density vs Altitude in an O'Neil Cylinder
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Thermodynamics: Internal Energy, Heat and Work Problem
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Reversible compression of a gas - faulty reasoning?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad How Do Eddy Current Dampers Work in Space Applications?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
High School How Does an IEC Fusion Reactor Work?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Undergrad Optimization problem with multiple outputs: impossible?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
High School Further Understanding Simultaneity Conventions
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Is Consciousness Truly Outside the Physical Realm?
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
14K
Graduate Creating Point Light Sources: Techniques, Alternatives & Bizarre Ideas
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K