MHB If a³ ≡ b³ (mod n) then a ≡ b (mod n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KOO
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The statement "If a³ ≡ b³ (mod n) then a ≡ b (mod n)" is false, as demonstrated by counterexamples such as 2 and 4 modulo 8, and 1 and 2 modulo 7. Additionally, it is noted that even with prime moduli, such as 13, the equivalence can fail. However, if 3 is coprime to φ(n) and both a and b are coprime to n, then the conclusion holds true, particularly in cases involving prime numbers like 17. This discussion highlights the nuances of modular arithmetic and the conditions under which the equivalence may or may not be valid.
KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let $a, b \in Z$ and $n \in N$ . Is the following necessarily true?
If $a^3 ≡b^3$(mod n) then $a ≡ b$ (mod n)

I know it's false but I can't think of an counterexample.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: If $a^3 ≡b^3$(mod n) then $a ≡ b$ (mod n)

KOO said:
Let $a, b \in Z$ and $n \in N$ . Is the following necessarily true?
If $a^3 ≡b^3$(mod n) then $a ≡ b$ (mod n)

I know it's false but I can't think of an counterexample.

No

$2^3 = 4^3$ mod 8
 
It can even happen with a prime modulus: $1^3 = 2^3\pmod7$.
 
Even in non-trivial cases : $4^3 = 10^3\pmod{13}$
 
Hi,
Here's an easy result in the positive direction.

If 3 is prime to $$\phi(n)$$ and both a and b are prime to n, then the conclusion does follow.

Example: n=17 or any prime p with 3 not dividing p-1
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top