MHB If A is nnd, then show that I + A is pd

  • Thread starter Thread starter insixyears
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pd
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between non-negative definite (nnd) and positive definite (pd) matrices, particularly in the context of the matrix equation x'Ax. It clarifies that for a matrix A to be nnd, it does not require all entries to be nonnegative, as the definition is based on the condition x'Ax ≥ 0 for all nonzero vectors x. Adding the identity matrix I to A results in a matrix I + A that is positive definite, since the equation x'(I+A)x will always yield a positive result. This understanding provides a new technique for tackling related homework problems. The conversation highlights the nuances of matrix definiteness and the implications of matrix operations.
insixyears
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
nnd = non negative definite matrix
pd = positive definite I'm having a tough time grappling with the concept of pd, psd matrices in general. My understanding basically just boils down to this, basically after multiplying everything out using the matrix formula x'Ax, you will get some sort of polynomial. If you get a polynomial where everything is squared, you're in good shape because it's impossible for the equation to be negative. A question that I have is, what does knowing that a matrix A is psd or pd tell us about the entries of A? Doesn't it only tell us how the entries of A interact (ie, when they are added up, you get something >= 0). If that's true, how would adding the identity matrix give you anymore information about the definiteness of the matrix?Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crabchef said:
nnd = non negative definite matrix
pd = positive definite I'm having a tough time grappling with the concept of pd, psd matrices in general. My understanding basically just boils down to this, basically after multiplying everything out using the matrix formula x'Ax, you will get some sort of polynomial. If you get a polynomial where everything is squared, you're in good shape because it's impossible for the equation to be negative. A question that I have is, what does knowing that a matrix A is psd or pd tell us about the entries of A? Doesn't it only tell us how the entries of A interact (ie, when they are added up, you get something >= 0). If that's true, how would adding the identity matrix give you anymore information about the definiteness of the matrix?Thanks!

This is clearly not true. For A to be nonnegative definite, all its entries are nonnegative. What if it has a 0 in any element other than on the main diagonal?
Adding the identity matrix won't change that...
 
crabchef said:
nnd = non negative definite matrix
pd = positive definite I'm having a tough time grappling with the concept of pd, psd matrices in general. My understanding basically just boils down to this, basically after multiplying everything out using the matrix formula x'Ax, you will get some sort of polynomial. If you get a polynomial where everything is squared, you're in good shape because it's impossible for the equation to be negative. A question that I have is, what does knowing that a matrix A is psd or pd tell us about the entries of A? Doesn't it only tell us how the entries of A interact (ie, when they are added up, you get something >= 0). If that's true, how would adding the identity matrix give you anymore information about the definiteness of the matrix?
The definition of nnd is that $x'Ax\geq0$ for every nonzero vector $x$. If that condition holds, then $x'(I+A)x = x'x + x'Ax >0$ (because $x'x>0$), and hence $I+A$ is pd.

Prove It said:
For A to be nonnegative definite, all its entries are nonnegative.
That is not true. The definition of nnd is as given by the OP. It does not imply that all the entries of the matrix are nonnegative.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help! As with many problems...AFTER seeing the answer it seems so simple. This gives me one more technique to approach my homework problems, but unfortunately I'm already stuck on the next one (going to keep working on it for a bit longer before I post the question)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
535
Replies
10
Views
2K