If a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels

AI Thread Summary
A system of three distinguishable atoms with energy levels of 0, e, and 2e has 27 microstates, as each atom can occupy one of the three states independently. The discussion clarifies that while classical mechanics might suggest 6 configurations, quantum mechanics allows for more complexity due to the distinguishability of particles. The confusion arises from the treatment of indistinguishable particles, where permutations do not yield new states. The explanation emphasizes that the total number of microstates is determined by the independent states available to each atom. Ultimately, the correct interpretation hinges on the nature of the particles and their energy states.
iontail
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
if a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels of fro example 0, e, 2e

would it be safe to say that the system only has three microstate or will it be 2^3 microstates.

if it is 2^3 can you please explain why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's 3 microstates. and won't be 8 anyway, it may be 6 "configurations" not microstates as follows:

classical mechanics says that it's 6=3x2x1 different configurations, because the particles would be distinguishable, like if you have 3 numbered balls in 3 different boxes, and you want to count how many configurations are possible.

Quantum mechanics says that particles like electrons are not distinguishable, therefore you have less configurations by N!, and so you only have 1 possible configuration, and yet three microstates. This gives the rise to Gibbs paradox, you can find something about that in Wikipedia.

I hope I answered your question.

good luck :)
 


thankyou veryy much
 


Welcome :)
 


iontail said:
if a system is made of 3 atoms with no degeneracy with energy levels of fro example 0, e, 2e

would it be safe to say that the system only has three microstate or will it be 2^3 microstates.

if it is 2^3 can you please explain why?


Each atom can be in three states. To specify the state of the three atom system means telling in which of the three state each individual atom is, so there are 3^3 = 27 microstates for the three atom system.

TheDestroyer's explanation is wrong and on the indistinguishability issue he is misleading, because if we talk about atoms that can be in certain energy level, we are usually talking about a system in which the atoms are in some position and the energy level refers to the electronic states only.

If you have a system in which you have three atoms in a box and the state refers to the complete quantum state that includes the translational motion, then depending on whether the atoms are Bosons or Fermions, can they be in the same state or not. Also, permuting te atoms does not yield a new state. But for system in which you have 3 atoms in 3 posible states, you can't divide by factorial 3 to take that into account, as you can easily see by writing down all the states.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top