If matter were to travel the speed of light, would it convert to

AI Thread Summary
If matter were to travel at the speed of light, it would not be possible due to the relativistic effects that increase its mass, making it impossible to reach that speed. According to E=mc^2, matter is a form of condensed energy and can be converted to energy in processes like nuclear fission. The Large Hadron Collider demonstrates how protons gain mass and energy as they approach light speed, leading to the creation of heavier particles upon collision. The discussion also touches on how light behaves differently in various mediums, such as water, where it slows down due to interactions with the medium's density. Overall, the conversation highlights the complex relationship between matter, energy, and the speed of light in physics.
adamnoellsch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If matter were to travel the speed of light, would it convert to energy?
 
Science news on Phys.org


The meaning of E=mc^2 is that matter, even standing perfectly still, has energy - and can be converted to other forms of energy in processes like nuclear fission.
 
Last edited:


Yes. What atyy is basically saying here is that since Einstein's publication of his most known formula, the way to interpret the world is that matter and energy are two faces of the same coin. Matter is a form of condensed energy, basically.

So at all times, matter is susceptible to be converted to energy. Think atomic bombs, for example. Now, the speed of light is something else. It acts as a kind of ultimate speed limit to the universe. There is no matter that can travel at, or faster than the speed of light. Only massless particles can travel at the speed of light.

If you tried to push a particle enough that it reached the speed of light, you would never manage to make it, because the closer the particle would get to the speed of light, the heavier it would get!(the reason for this involves a relativistic understanding of Time, which is better discussed in the relativity subforums)

And since the Large Hadron Collider is in the news lately, this is exactly what goes on in that 27km tunnel. Electromagnets push on groups of protons that fly in opposite directions the tunnel, thus giving them kinetic energy. The closer to the speed of light these protons get, the heavier they get due to all that accumulated energy. When they collide, that accumulated energy needs to go somewhere, so it "condenses" into matter; heavy particles. The higher the speed, the higher the energy of the particles. The higher the energy, the more massive the particles created are! (this is where the w and z bosons come from, which are 100 times more massive than a single proton, and why it was necessary to build the LHC to reach higher energies so that the elusive Higgs boson can be created/observed)
 


not trying to hijack this thread but Rhannmah's response made me question something. so nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, but in a different medium such as water (ie: Cerenkov radiation) it is possible.

so how is it possible for the speed of light to change in a different medium?
so when photons try to move at their universally constant rate, c, what is it in different mediums that slow them down? i see that the speed of light, in water lose 1/4 of their speed
if photons are massless then how could any particle that has mass can ever exceed the massless particles speed? or does it have to do with the density of the medium, but if it has to do with the density or mass of the medium then would that not have the same, if not greater, effect on a particle with mass having to encounter the same resistance thus balancing it out?

i'm a newb, long time reader, first time poster :)
 
Last edited:


moogyjackson said:
not trying to hijack this thread but Rhannmah's response made me question something. so nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, but in a different medium such as water (ie: Cerenkov radiation) it is possible.

so how is it possible for the speed of light to change in a different medium?
so when photons try to move at their universally constant rate, c, what is it in different mediums that slow them down? i see that the speed of light, in water lose 1/4 of their speed
if photons are massless then how could any particle that has mass can ever exceed the massless particles speed? or does it have to do with the density of the medium, but if it has to do with the density or mass of the medium then would that not have the same, if not greater, effect on a particle with mass having to encounter the same resistance thus balancing it out?

i'm a newb, long time reader, first time poster :)

You may want to start by reading the FAQ in the General Physics forum.

Zz.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top