If you wanted to specialize in another subfield

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catria
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the considerations and preferences of individuals when selecting PhD programs in different subfields. Participants share specific schools they would have applied to or avoided based on their research interests. For example, one individual highlights Yale as a top choice for particle experimentalism while dismissing WUSTL, Vanderbilt, and Dartmouth due to a lack of relevant faculty or personal preferences. The conversation reveals how program offerings and faculty expertise significantly influence application decisions in academia. Ultimately, the choice of schools reflects a strategic approach to aligning research interests with available resources.
Catria
Messages
145
Reaction score
4
... what schools would you have considered but didn't? Alternatively, what schools would you have crossed off your list?

This question is addressed to those who once contemplated a different subfield while applying to PhD programs, or those already in a PhD program.

I'll start: if I wanted to become a particle experimentalist (rather than a theoretical particle cosmologist), I would have applied to Yale without fail, and I wouldn't have considered WUSTL, Vanderbilt or Dartmouth at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Catria said:
I would have applied to Yale without fail, and I wouldn't have considered WUSTL, Vanderbilt or Dartmouth at all.
Why is that?
 
Yale had what I would want in an experimental particle group, while WUSTL, Dartmouth had no particle experimentalist at all, and I hated CMS (hence no Vanderbilt and no Minnesota either)
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top