If you were a medical physicist?

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a patient receiving 9GBq of I-131 and subsequently dying, the risk to those involved in the autopsy, including the embalmer, is minimal if standard procedures are followed. The administered dose is unlikely to cause harm, and typical handling protocols for deceased patients should suffice. Health physicists in hospitals monitor occupational doses, and if the patient was released under 10 CFR 35.75, the exposure to the embalmer can be calculated and adjusted accordingly. Special precautions are only necessary if the patient had not been released, but established radiation protection procedures are likely in place for such cases. Overall, the situation emphasizes the importance of following established safety protocols in handling radioactive materials.
raldenorsful
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
My prof gave this kind of situation:
"Radioiodine therapy has been frequently used to help treat malignancies in the thyroid gland. Assume that a patient was administered 9GBq of I-131, and 27 hours later the patient suffered a cardiac arrest and died. If you were the medical physicist of the hospital. what recommendation would you give to the people involve in the autopsy like the embalmer..?"
so anyone have an idea...?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If 9GBq was administered to a patient it can't be very harmful, and you would get only a tiny fraction of the exposure to the patient if normal procedures for handling dead bodies were followed.
"don't cut out the thyroid and put it on your sandwich" should be enough.
 
Hospitals also have health physicists who are responsible for monitoring occupational doses. If the cardiac patient has been released under 10 CFR 35.75, you discount the dose from the administration of the I-131 to the person, which means you have to determine the exposure to the embalmer (assuming they are monitored) during the procedure and subtract that from their exposure.

As willem2 implied, the dose is not liable to cause any injury, so if the embalmer is not normally monitored, you don't have to do anything special. If the patient had not yet been released, then you need to take pracautions to reduce their exposure. However, the radiation protection program likely has procedures for such situations anyway.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top