I'm looking for a replacement textbook for the one given to me in class

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tekee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a replacement textbook for AP Physics, particularly for the energy unit, which falls under mechanics. The original textbook is deemed inadequate, prompting the search for alternatives available on platforms like eBay or Amazon, with no significant budget constraints. A recommendation is made for the Princeton Review's book tailored for the Calculus-based AP Physics test, noted for its clear explanations and ample practice problems. Participants are encouraged to share their current textbooks and suggestions for effective resources. The goal is to enhance understanding and performance in the course, especially with calculus concepts involved.
Tekee
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I'm in AP Physics right now (currently studying energy - not sure what category that falls into. Mechanics?) and I've found my textbook to be less helpful than what I thought it would be. So I'm considering investing in a new one that I could get off ebay/amazon, and the price really doesn't matter so long as it isn't extensive.

Any ideas? (And remember, this is a High School/AP course so Calculus IS involved, like basic derivatives/integrals.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was in high school I bought the Princeton Review's book designed for the Calculus based AP Physics test and did good (4 on Mechanics, 5 on E&M and my class wasn't geared toward the calc based Physics tests, only the non-calc based). It does a good job of explaining things and has a lot of practice problems.
 
What is the book that you are currently using?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
12K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
19K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top