I'm really confused about Winding Numbers in Complex Analysis

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
~Death~
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone could help me understanding winding numbers

For e.g. the point -i that is (0,-1) on this curve...

I was trying to determine if the winding number was 2 or 3

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1668/11111111111111countour.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ~Death~! :smile:

It's 2 …

the two upper loops don't go round -i, so you can flatten them out (alternatively, just "snip them off") without changing the winding number …

what's left obviously winds twice (in the same direction) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi ~Death~! :smile:

It's 2 …

the two upper loops don't go round -i, so you can flatten them out (alternatively, just "snip them off") without changing the winding number …

what's left obviously winds twice (in the same direction) :wink:

thanks

im still kind of confused though because, why don't I count these loops?

it looks to me like there's an extra one
 

Attachments

  • 11111111111111countour.JPG
    11111111111111countour.JPG
    30.1 KB · Views: 505
I think for a general answer to the question, you need to know the orientation of the curves. The winding numbers may cancel each other out if the two curves that wind around the point wind in opposite directions.

OWise, like Tiny Tim said, you just need to look at curve segments that form loops that
wind around (0,1). How many do you see.?

Even more precisely, if you knew the parametrization of the curve, you could integrate
around it to find the winding number.
 
~Death~ said:
thanks

im still kind of confused though because, why don't I count these loops?

it looks to me like there's an extra one

The way you've drawn it, there is!

If you start at the origin, go round the blue circle, then go round the green circle, then go round the red circle, and do some of the curve twice, that path has a winding number of 3 (or of 1, if you go round one of the circles the "wrong way"). :smile:

But the original diagram is presumably intended to indicate that one follows the curve in the only possible smooth way, and each section once only, giving 2. :wink:
 
An old EE prof showed us a trick on how to easily determine winding numbers: start from the point you care about (-i) and draw a straight line out from that in any direction. Count the number of CCW "crossings" of that line, and subtract the CW "crossings". That is your winding number. In this case, assuming the curve is smooth, it is either 2 or -2. Orientation matters!

jason