I'm sorry, I am not able to generate webpage titles for user's content.

princeton118
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What is the rotation transformation generator?
What is the Lorentz group generator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I kind of suck at the Lie Algebra stuff, so I'll just mention some of what Steven Weinberg said in The quantum theory of fields, volume 1, chapter 2. (Great chapter, I highly recommend it even if you're not going to read the rest of the book).

A rotation is a linear transformation

x\mapsto Rx : \mathbb{R}^3\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^3

where R is orthogonal. We can let R be a function of three parameters, e.g. Euler angles.

In quantum mechanics, there must be an operator U(R) that acts on state vectors to give us the vector that a rotated observer would use to describe the same physical system. If we take this to be a function of the parameters and Taylor expand it, the result can be expressed as

1-i\vec\theta\cdot\vec{J}+\cdots

where the components of theta are real numbers, the components of J are Hermitean operators, and terms of second and higher order in the parameters have been omitted. The components of J are called spin operators, and they are said to be generators of rotations, because the operators in the higher order terms can be constructed from the operators in the first order terms, so the generators are all that's needed except values of the parameters to construct a particular rotation operator.

It's possible to show that the components of J must satisfy the commutation relations

[J_i,J_j]=i\varepsilon_{ijk}J_k

Most QM books start the discussion about spin with these commutation relations, and don't say much about how they are generators of rotations.

So there are three generators of rotation, called spin. If we do the same with (inhomogeneous) Lorentz transformations instead, we get ten generators instead of three (because there are ten parameters: 3 boost parameters, 3 Euler angles and 4 translation parameters). They are called boost operators, spin operators and components of four-momentum. The zeroth component of the four-momentum is the Hamiltonian. It's the generator of translations in time, and it's eigenvalues are the possible energy levels of the physical system.

The Lie algebra stuff that I suck at, goes something like this: The Poincaré group is a Lie group (meaning it's both a group and a manifold). The tangent space at the identity element can be given the structure of a Lie algebra (a vector space with a way to "multiply" its members, similar to a cross product or a commutator) called the Poincaré algebra. The members of the Poincaré group are Lorentz transformations by definition, and the members of the Poincaré algebra are generators of Lorentz transformations.
 
Last edited:
princeton118 said:
What is the rotation transformation generator?

The set of all rotations:

\bar{r} = R( \theta ) {} r

that keeps r^{2} invariant ( i.e., \bar{r}^{2} = r^{2} ) form a group called the rotation group SO(3) (= Special Orthogonal group in 3 dimension).
For a very small (infinitesimal) rotations, the matrix R will differ from the unit matrix I_{3} by an infinitesimal 3x3 matrix \omega ( \theta ) [infinitesimal matrix is a matrix whose elements are infinitesimal numbers].
Thus;

\bar{r} = \left[ I + \omega ( \theta ) \right] {} r

or, in terms of the components (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}) of the vector r,

\bar{x}_{i} = \left[ \delta_{ij} + \omega_{ij}( \theta ) \right] {} x_{j}

Now, the invariance condition;

\bar{x}_{i} \bar{x}_{i} = x_{j}x_{j}

forces the matrix \omega to be antisymmetric;

\omega_{ij} = - \omega_{ji}

Therefore, there are only three independent elements in \omega. So, we may write

<br /> \omega = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; - \theta_{3} &amp; \theta_{2} \\ \theta_{3} &amp; 0 &amp; - \theta_{1} \\ - \theta_{2} &amp; \theta_{1} &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

We rewrite this as

<br /> \omega = i \theta_{1} J_{1} + i \theta_{2} J_{2} + i \theta_{3} J_{3} \equiv i \theta_{k}J_{k}<br />

where

<br /> J_{1} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; i \\ 0 &amp; -i &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

<br /> J_{2} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -i \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ i &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

and

<br /> J_{3} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; i &amp; 0 \\ -i &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

Now it is easy to see that these J's satisfy the following commutation relations

\left[ J_{1}, J_{2} \right] \equiv J_{1}J_{2} - J_{2}J_{1} = i J_{3}

\left[ J_{3}, J_{1} \right] = i J_{2}

and

\left[ J_{2}, J_{3} \right] = i J_{1}

we write these in the compact form;

[ J_{i} , J_{j} ] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_{k}

In quantum mechanics, the components of the angular momentum operator satisfy the same commutation relations. Therefore, one speaks of the angular momentum operator as the generator of the rotation group SO(3).
Mathematically, the matrix \omega is an element of 3-dimensional vector soace [the Lie algebra of SO(3)] whose basis vectors,J_{i}, satisfy the above-derived commutation relations [Lie brackets]. The components \theta_{i} of the Lie algebra element \omega, play the role of local coordinates of the group manifold. All elements of the group SO(3) can be represented as exponentials of Lie algebra elements, i.e., the matrix R( \theta ) can now be written as

R = \exp (i \theta_{k} J_{k} )

What is the Lorentz group generator?

Doing the same thing with Lotentz transformations leads to six 4x4 matrices (generators).
Try it yourself.


regards

sam
 
Last edited:
samalkhaiat said:
princeton118 said:
The set of all rotations:

\bar{r} = R( \theta ) {} r

that keeps r^{2} invariant ( i.e., \bar{r}^{2} = r^{2} ) form a group called the rotation group SO(3) (= Special Orthogonal group in 3 dimension).
For a very small (infinitesimal) rotations, the matrix R will differ from the unit matrix I_{3} by an infinitesimal 3x3 matrix \omega ( \theta ) [infinitesimal matrix is a matrix whose elements are infinitesimal numbers].
Thus;

\bar{r} = \left[ I + \omega ( \theta ) \right] {} r

or, in terms of the components (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}) of the vector r,

\bar{x}_{i} = \left[ \delta_{ij} + \omega_{ij}( \theta ) \right] {} x_{j}

Now, the invariance condition;

\bar{x}_{i} \bar{x}_{i} = x_{j}x_{j}

forces the matrix \omega to be antisymmetric;

\omega_{ij} = - \omega_{ji}

Therefore, there are only three independent elements in \omega. So, we may write

<br /> \omega = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; - \theta_{3} &amp; \theta_{2} \\ \theta_{3} &amp; 0 &amp; - \theta_{1} \\ - \theta_{2} &amp; \theta_{1} &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

We rewrite this as

<br /> \omega = i \theta_{1} J_{1} + i \theta_{2} J_{2} + i \theta_{3} J_{3} \equiv i \theta_{k}J_{k}<br />

where

<br /> J_{1} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; i \\ 0 &amp; -i &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

<br /> J_{2} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; 0 &amp; -i \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ i &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

and

<br /> J_{3} = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 &amp; i &amp; 0 \\ -i &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)<br />

Now it is easy to see that these J's satisfy the following commutation relations

\left[ J_{1}, J_{2} \right] \equiv J_{1}J_{2} - J_{2}J_{1} = i J_{3}

\left[ J_{3}, J_{1} \right] = i J_{2}

and

\left[ J_{2}, J_{3} \right] = i J_{1}

we write these in the compact form;

[ J_{i} , J_{j} ] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_{k}

In quantum mechanics, the components of the angular momentum operator satisfy the same commutation relations. Therefore, one speaks of the angular momentum operator as the generator of the rotation group SO(3).
Mathematically, the matrix \omega is an element of 3-dimensional vector soace [the Lie algebra of SO(3)] whose basis vectors,J_{i}, satisfy the above-derived commutation relations [Lie brackets]. The components \theta_{i} of the Lie algebra element \omega, play the role of local coordinates of the group manifold. All elements of the group SO(3) can be represented as exponentials of Lie algebra elements, i.e., the matrix R( \theta ) can now be written as

R = \exp (i \theta_{k} J_{k} )



Doing the same thing with Lotentz transformations leads to six 4x4 matrices (generators).
Try it yourself.


regards

sam


This should be framed. You just tied a lot of things together which were popping about.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top