Image assurance/quality autoregulation

  • Thread starter Thread starter duplImaging
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Imaging
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on imaging quality assurance, specifically the detection and measurement of image quality in medical imaging. Key points include the recognition that while image quality is largely qualitative, there are quantifiable metrics such as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), and patient dose considerations that can be used for assessment. The conversation highlights the importance of modality- and device-specific guidelines, referencing several authoritative documents like the CPQR TQC Guidelines and AAPM Task Group reports, which provide standards for various imaging systems. Additionally, there is interest in more general concepts related to imaging quality, such as modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency, suggesting a need for comprehensive resources that cover both specific and broad aspects of imaging quality assurance.
duplImaging
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I just was looking for possible information in the field of imaging quality assurance. I was wondering if their were any predominant scripts or papers on the subject of detecting the quality of an image. I know measuring how "good" an image is incredibly qualitative however, there are quantitative parts to it. Measurable things such as SNR, CNR or dose to patient size; I'm currently trying to find papers in the field that discuss the idea of quality assurance using methods such as these, and ideally other methods. Sorry if this is the wrong place to post, but doing my own research I haven't found anything in medical physics or the clinical world that touches on the subjects. I was recently discussing ideas to execute this sort of quality determination and I'm very curious about it now. Thank you.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A lot of the imaging QA standards are going to be modality- and even device-specific. So for example, some guidelines that I often refer to are here:
You can probably look to the AAPM Task group reports if you need something more specific.

Or are you looking for a reference that covers concepts more generally - like a modulation transfer function, detective quantum efficiency, contrast-detail curves, etc?
My goto reference for such things is: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0781780578/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top