Image charge method to find Green's function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for determining Green's functions in electrostatics, specifically comparing the image charge method and the orthonormal eigenfunction approach. Participants explore the applicability of these methods in various scenarios, including the case of infinite parallel conducting plates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the specific differences between the image charge method and the orthonormal eigenfunction method for finding Green's functions.
  • Another participant requests an example of finding Green's function using either method.
  • There is a question about the applicability of both methods to the same problem.
  • A participant notes that the image charge method is challenging for two parallel plates due to the requirement of an infinite set of image charges.
  • One participant mentions a task requiring the use of the image charge method.
  • Another participant states that while the image charge method may not always be applicable, both methods yield the same result when applicable, and suggests that an infinite series of image charges could be used for two parallel plates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the applicability of the image charge method for specific configurations, particularly for two parallel plates, indicating that multiple competing views remain on this topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in the image charge method's practicality for certain geometries, such as the need for an infinite series of image charges for parallel plates, which may not be straightforward.

ahmad1992
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi guys,
my professor told me in the class that when we would like to determine green function there are two general method i.e using image charge and using orthonormal eigen function. However I don't understand what are the specific differences between them. Anybody can help me? Moreover in the problem systems that solved by using image charge (as far as I have seen), there is always point charge there. Can image charge method be used in a problem like finding green function in a space (without charge) between 2 infinite parallel conducting plates for example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give an example of finding Green's function by either method?
 
That's why I am asking, can we use both of them for same problem or not ?
 
ahmad1992 said:
Moreover in the problem systems that solved by using image charge (as far as I have seen), there is always point charge there. Can image charge method be used in a problem like finding green function in a space (without charge) between 2 infinite parallel conducting plates for example?
The Green's function is defined as the potential due to a point charge with all surfaces grounded.
The image charge method is difficult to use for 2 parallel plates, because that requires an infinite set of image charges.
 
Oh unfortunately I have a task to solve it usi b g image charge
 
The only difference between the two methods is that the image-charge method is not always applicable in practice. Of course, at the end you get the same result with both methods when applicable. It works for the half-plane and the sphere straight-forwardly. For two parallel plates I think you can use it, introducing an infinite series of image charges and summing up their contributions.

Since this is a typical home-work problem, you should ask this question in the homework section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K