Image formation and ray diagrams

AI Thread Summary
Covering the top half of a lens with a mask will block light rays from the top half of the object, potentially resulting in only the bottom half of the image being visible. However, light rays from the top half can still reach the bottom part of the lens, allowing for some image formation. If a mask with a small hole is placed in front of the lens, it will limit the light entering the lens, but the image will still be formed based on the rays passing through the hole. The overall visibility of the image will depend on the specific arrangement and the amount of light reaching the screen. Experimentation is essential to confirm these theoretical outcomes.
fellowsk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok, a lens is held upright with a piece of clay. In front of it is a bulb, and behind it is a screen at the location of the image of the bulb. Now, what would happen to the image if the top half of the lens were covered by a mask? And what if the mask had a small hole in the center and were placed in front of the lens? This is an extra credit lab, and I have been trying to figure it all out on my own, but this question I really have no idea.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
why don't you test it and see?
 
I don't have the equipment to test it and experiment.
 
See, I keep thinking that you would not be able to see the top half of the image. But the light rays from the top half of the object could strike the bottom part of the convex lens and still form the image. The same reasoning goes for covering the lens with a mask with a hole in it. Or would you only see the middle of the lens? Help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top