Image of a Linear Transformation

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0
T2 projects orthogonally onto the xz-plane

T3 rotates clockwise through an angle of 3π/4 radians about the x axis

The point (-3, -4, -3) is first mapped by T2 and then T3. what are the coordinates of the resulting point?

this question is on a program call Calmaeth. My answer for this question is (-3,0,-√2/2). The program says its wrong but i have checked thoroughly many times and cannot find my mistake.

My transformation matrix for T2 is ##
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}
## and for T3 is ##
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-1}{√2} & \frac{1}{√2} \\
0 & \frac{-1}{√2} & \frac{-1}{√2}
\end{pmatrix}
##
To get the resulting standard matrix, i did T3*T2 and then multiplied this matrix by the point (-3, -4, -3) to get the resulting point.

Can anyone see where i went wrong if i did? (also to let you know, the program said my matrices for T2&T3 were correct)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is fine. Assuming your matrices are right, it looks like you made an error with the matrix multiplication. What did you get for ##T3 * T2##?
 
I agree with jbuniii. The "-3" and "0" are correct but I do not get -\sqrt{2}/2 as the third component when I multiply your matrices.

(As a check, rather than multiplying T3*T2 first and then multiplying that by the vector, you can multiply the vector by T2 and then multiply the result by T3.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
The "-3" and "0" are correct
How is the "0" correct?
 
oay said:
How is the "0" correct?

Yes, only the ##-3## is correct.

Anyway, please post this in the homework forum next time! Thanks :smile:
 
Hi guys It was a rookie mistake on my part. I was doing [-3,-4,-3]*[standard matrix] . when i should have been doing [standard matrix]*##\begin{pmatrix}
-3 \\
-4 \\
-3
\end{pmatrix}##
And sorry, in the future ill post in the homework section.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top