Image of f(x) = x/(1+|x|): Find the Range

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demonoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x) = x/(1+|x|) is being analyzed to determine its range. The initial assumption is that the image is R, but the user is uncertain. To find the range, it is suggested to split the function into cases for positive and negative x, which simplifies the analysis. By applying elementary theorems of analysis, one can establish upper and lower bounds for the function. Ultimately, this approach will clarify the actual range of the function.
Demonoid
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I've given a function where f: R->R, and need to determine an image(or range):

f(x) = x/(1+|x|)

I've pretty sure the image is R, but I'm not positive:

Heres my attempt:

y/1 = x/(1+|x|)
y(1+|x|) = x
y+ y|x| = x
y|x| = x - y... I'm kinda stuck here, since I can't determine an image from this ?


any help is welcome !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Split the function up in for positive and negative x. Then it should be easy to find upper and lower bounds. Together with some elementary theorems of analysis it should be easy to argue what the image can be.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top