Imaginary factor in WAVE guide TE field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the role of the imaginary factor in the TE10 mode field equations in waveguides. The user is analyzing the equations for the electric and magnetic fields, specifically focusing on the term \(\frac{-jωμm\pi}{k^{2}a}\) and its impact on the fields. It is clarified that this factor contributes a phase shift of 90° to the electric field as the wave propagates, which can be expressed using complex number identities. The user seeks confirmation on their interpretation of this phase delay and its implications for the field behavior. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the significance of complex factors in wave propagation analysis.
FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
Hey guys. I'm trying to comprehend the TEmn EM fields in wave guides. I've gone through the derivation, using Pozar's microwave textbook, and for the most part it's straight forward. I am having a hard time though determining what the effect of the imaginary factor in the field equations are.
Here is the simplest case, a TE10 wave propagating in the z direction, with a picture of the waveguide dimentions and the E field as I would imagine it to be.
The E and H fields are given as:

E_{y} = \frac{-jωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} e^{-jβz}

H_{x} = \frac{jβm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} e^{-jβz}

k1an3a.jpg


I understand there is a dependency on z from the e^{-jβz} factor.
I also understand there is a time and frequency dependancy (not shown) from e^{jωt} factor.
But what I'm really trying to understand is, how does the factor, \frac{-jωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} , effect the fields?
I'm not sure how I should tread the imaginary factor in this case.
Thanks a lot.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When we use complex numbers to describe real quantities, such as amplitudes of fields along a waveguide, the real value is found by multiplying by e^jωt then taking the real part.

Ey(x,y,z,t) = Re[\frac{-jωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} e^{-jβz}e^{jωt}]:

These steps are not written explicitly but are understood.
 
Thanks emi guy, but I think you missunderstood what part I was asking about. I got that there is an assumed factor e^{jωt}, but what I didn't understand was the first factor, colored red, in the Ey field equation below.

Ey(x,y,z,t) = Re [\frac{-jωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} e^{-jβz}e^{jωt}]:

I've been thinking about it though, about what it's affect on the E field is. If you could tell me if I'm right or not I'd be grateful.
Using the identity: j = e^{j\frac{\pi}{2}}

The Ey field becomes:
Ey(x,y,z,t) = Re [\frac{ωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} e^{-jβz}e^{jωt} e^{-j\frac{\pi}{2}} ]

which is
[\frac{ωμm\pi}{k^{2}a} A sin\frac{mx\pi}{a} cos(\omegat - βz - 90°)

which will just delay the phase 90° as the wave propagates along the z direction.

Hope I'm on the right track. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top