Imaginary Time in Spin Foams: How is it Utilized in Quantum Gravity Theories?

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
In QM and QFT, imaginary time is used to make the oscillatory path integral converge, and also to handle terms that are not semibounded in Minkowski spacetime.

In CDT, imaginary time is also used after the path integral is restricted to "causal" configurations.

How is the oscillatory term handled in spin foams?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this not the point of Euclidean spin-foams?
 
genneth said:
Is this not the point of Euclidean spin-foams?

Looking in Perez's notes, Eq 27 for a Euclidean spin foam, it looks like he still has the i in the path integral. I guess the Euclidean means that it produces a geometry with Euclidean signature (I guess he takes only one of the two imaginary time replacements)?
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top