Impact Force Comparison: Car vs. Wall Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter sinas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept
AI Thread Summary
In a head-on collision at 50 mph, whether with an identical car or a stationary wall, the impact force experienced by the car is the same, assuming identical conditions and collision times. The discussion emphasizes that both scenarios result in the same change in momentum, leading to equal average forces. Theoretical considerations suggest that if both cars were made of uniform material, they would not penetrate each other, reinforcing the notion of equal impact. However, in real-world scenarios, drivers might prefer colliding with another car due to potential safety features. Ultimately, the calculations confirm that the average force is determined by the change in momentum, which remains consistent across both collision types.
sinas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Consider two situations:

1) You are driving 50 mph and crash head on into an identical car also going 50 mph.
2) You are driving 50 mph and crash head on into a stationary brick wall.

In neither case does your car bounce off the thing it hits, and the collision time is the same in both cases. Which of these two situations would result in the greatest impact force? (a-hitting the car, b-hitting the wall, c-forces equal, d-not enough info)

My intuition tells me that it's A, but I've learned not to trust my intuition
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's not a good idea to trust intuition, when there's something better : definition ! :smile:

How would you calculate the average impact force on your car ? Start from the definition.
 
Assuming the two cars are identical, and traveling at the same speed, but in opposite directions

Imagine the vertical plane that defines where the two cars meet. Would any part of either car penetrate this invisible plane? In practice, with real world cars, they probably would, as some of the hard bits of one car would punch their way into the softer bits of the other one, and vice versa.

But if we assume the cars are made of uniform stuff, say we replace the cars in our thought experiment with solid identical lumps of steel, then there is no reason to think that any part of either lump would pass through the invisible boundary. In which case we can replace the invisible boundary with an inpenetrable, unmovable wall, and not lessen the impact in any way.

So I would say with the sorts of cars that populate the world of physics questions, there is no difference between the two impacts. But if you asked me to choose whether I would rather drive my own car into an identical car coming the other way at the same speed, or into a solid wall, I would choose the other car every time.
 
average force = impulse/time

If the times are the same, then it just depends on the impulse, which is change in momentum...

For the two cars..
m(50)+m(-50)=2m(0)
delta p = m(50)

?

For the wall..
 
sinas said:
average force = impulse/time

If the times are the same, then it just depends on the impulse, which is change in momentum...
Good.

For the two cars..
m(50)+m(-50)=2m(0)
delta p = m(50)

?

For the wall..
You are only interested in the change in momentum of your car in both cases. You're nearly there. How is change in momentum defined ?

(After doing this, look into ceptimus' visualization approach and see if that agrees with what you get this way)
 
So if your car has the same momentum going into each collision, and has 0 final momentum (mass*0 velocity?), then delta p for your car (and thus the force) is the same for each?
 
BTW thanks both of you for the help :smile:
 
Back
Top