Impacts of Excessive Gravity on Planetary Life

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darkmisc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
AI Thread Summary
Excessive gravity on a planet can significantly hinder movement and overall biological function, impacting both larger organisms and microscopic life forms like bacteria. Evolution would likely adapt life forms to the specific gravitational conditions, potentially leading to unique adaptations suited for high-gravity environments. Research indicates that planets with masses three to four times that of Earth could exist, raising questions about their habitability. The concept of the Goldilocks zone highlights the delicate balance needed for life to thrive, suggesting that gravity is a crucial factor in this equation. Understanding these dynamics is essential for assessing the potential for life on exoplanets.
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
I read somewhere that the size and gravity of a planet is one factor in its ability to support life.

What would be the consequences for life if a planet's gravity were too strong?

I can imagine that moving around would be difficult, but would there also be consequences for bacteria?


Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Too strong for what? My guess is that whatever evolution takes place the resultant life will be suited to the gravity of the planet.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top