Understanding Low Impedance & EMI/RFI in Audio

  • Thread starter Thread starter cda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    emi impedance
AI Thread Summary
Low impedance audio systems are less susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) and radio frequency interference (RFI) primarily because they reduce the efficiency of cables acting as antennas for electric fields. When a low impedance load is used, it diminishes the voltage induced by interference, effectively minimizing its impact on audio signals. In contrast, high impedance systems can generate higher voltages from induced currents, making them more vulnerable to interference. However, low impedance does not always mitigate issues from magnetic fields, where different strategies may be required. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing audio performance in environments with potential interference.
cda
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question in relation to audio.

I read online that a low impedance system is less susceptible to EMI and RFI than high impedance. How? I thought that high impedance = high resistance, therefore higher resistance to EMI and RFI. Would love to be updated with the explanation.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cda said:
Question in relation to audio.

I read online that a low impedance system is less susceptible to EMI and RFI than high impedance. How? I thought that high impedance = high resistance, therefore higher resistance to EMI and RFI. Would love to be updated with the explanation.

Thanks.
This is the case when the interferer has mainly an electric field. For instance, the AC mains supply, or maybe a computer. The audio cable acts as an antenna, and develops a voltage as a result of the interfering field. If we terminate the "antenna " with a low impedance, its efficiency as an antenna is greatly reduced. We can choose what impedance we use for our wanted audio, so it makes sense to make it low.
In more detail, a few metres of wire acting as an antenna at audio frequencies is like a small capacitor, so it has a very high impedance (a high capacitive reactance). If we terminate it with a low value resistor, there is potential divider action and the interfering voltage is greatly reduced.
In some cases, magnetic fields are a problem, and using a low impedance will not then be effective as a cure.
 
To say it another way:
The EMI fields can only induce a small current. If the circuit is high impedance, that means a high voltage, and vice versa.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...

Similar threads

Back
Top