Impedance matching derivation (next best after complex conjugate method)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The next best method for impedance matching after the complex conjugate method is to set the load impedance, Z_L, equal to the magnitude of the source impedance, |Z_s|. This approach assumes that Z_L is purely resistive, which maximizes power transfer under the condition that no reactance is allowed. The discussion highlights the importance of minimizing the reflection coefficient, although the exact criteria for defining "second-best" matching impedance remain unclear.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impedance matching principles
  • Familiarity with complex impedance notation (Z = R + jX)
  • Knowledge of maximum power transfer theorem
  • Basic concepts of reflection coefficients in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the maximum power transfer theorem in detail
  • Learn about reflection coefficients and their impact on circuit performance
  • Explore the implications of using purely resistive loads in impedance matching
  • Investigate advanced impedance matching techniques beyond the complex conjugate method
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit theory, and professionals involved in RF design and signal integrity optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Tetraoxygen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
(This is not a question I was given to solve, it is a question about the course notes.)

Homework Statement


In impedance matching, what is the next best method after the complex conjugate method?
If the source has V_s and Z_s, what should Z_L be?
V_s, Z_s, and Z_L are in series.

Homework Equations


The best impedance match is when Z_s = (Z_L)*
And this was derived from maximum power transfer, or
P = (I_rms)^2 * R_L = 1/2 * (|V_s|/( |Z_s + Z_L| )) = ...

The Attempt at a Solution


The notes say
Z_L = R = |Z_s|

This says the next best choice is having Z_L be a resistance equal to the magnitude of Z_s.

However, from the math I did, this assumes that there cannot be a reactance for Z_L.
Why this assumption?

Edit: Why is this the "second-best method"? Why is there the assumption that there is no load reactance?
(I do not have any criteria either. It is from a handout. I will ask the professor after the 1st day of class, I guess.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tetraoxygen;4051178[h2 said:
The Attempt at a Solution[/h2]
The notes say
Z_L = R = |Z_s|

This says the next best choice is having Z_L be a resistance equal to the magnitude of Z_s.

However, from the math I did, this assumes that there cannot be a reactance for Z_L.
Why this assumption?

By definition, |Z_s| is a real quantity, i.e. a resistance, not a complex impedance.

As to what constitutes "second-best" matching impedance I have no idea. No criterion(a) was/were offered.
 
rude man said:
By definition, |Z_s| is a real quantity, i.e. a resistance, not a complex impedance.

As to what constitutes "second-best" matching impedance I have no idea. No criterion(a) was/were offered.
I am aware that this method yields a real number.

My question is, why is this the second best matching impedance.

No criteria were offered to me either...

Anyone with real-world experience?
 
OK I think I know.

What is meant is: if a complex load is not permitted, i.e. if it has to be resistive, then the highest power transfer is when Z_L = R = |Z_s|. And that is correct.

(Has to be that: otherwise you could just say, OK, let Z_L = R_s - jX_s + ε where Z_s = R_s + jX_s and ε is an arbitrarily small resistance!)

So: can you proceed with that info? Hint: what is |i|, the current? Then what is power P_L, then how do you determine optimum R_L for max P_L?
 
rude man said:
OK I think I know.

What is meant is: if a complex load is not permitted, i.e. if it has to be resistive, then the highest power transfer is when Z_L = R = |Z_s|. And that is correct.

(Has to be that: otherwise you could just say, OK, let Z_L = R_s - jX_s + ε where Z_s = R_s + jX_s and ε is an arbitrarily small resistance!)

So: can you proceed with that info? Hint: what is |i|, the current? Then what is power P_L, then how do you determine optimum R_L for max P_L?
I'm sorry, but that is not what I meant.

I want to know Why is a complex load not permitted in the second best method? Why is this the second best method?

I've already done the math showing that this R_L corresponds to maximizing P_L when Z_L is only a resistance, not a reactance.
 
Tetraoxygen said:
I'm sorry, but that is not what I meant.

I want to know Why is a complex load not permitted in the second best method? Why is this the second best method?

I've already done the math showing that this R_L corresponds to maximizing P_L when Z_L is only a resistance, not a reactance.

There used to be a commercial on TV about a hair dye product that went: "Only your hairdresser knows for sure".

Only your instructor knows for sure.
 
So the bad news: The professor does not remember any more why this is so. :( He said it was just best practices.

And the better news: He says it may have something to to do with minimizing the reflection coefficient.

Thoughts?
 
Tetraoxygen said:
So the bad news: .

And the better news: He says it may have something to to do with minimizing the reflection coefficient.

Thoughts?

Can't be that either. You'd get zero reflection coefficient if Z_L = Z_s. So if Z_s is complex, so is Z_L.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K