Impedance of an RLC series circuit when in resonance

[fluidistic]

I don't find my notes right now, I'll try to use my memory on this.
According to my notes, the impedance of an RLC series circuit is given by \frac{1}{\sqrt{R^2+\left ( \omega L-\frac{1}{\omega C}\right )^2 }}.
So when in resonance, Z=\frac{1}{R} instead of Z=R.

Also if I recall well, for an RLC parallel circuit, Z=\frac{1}{\sqrt { \frac{1}{R^2} } +\left ( \omega C-\frac{1}{\omega L}\right )^2 } or something close to this, meaning that in resonance Z=R instead of Z=1/R.
Are my notes wrong? Or am I doing something wrong?

 

[Born2bwire]

Your notes have to be wrong because all your impedances are real. The reactance caused by the inductive and capacitive elements give rise to imaginary impedances. The wikipedia article gives the results but they are trivial to work out yourself too.

Series: Z = R-i\omega L+\frac{i}{\omega C}
Parallel: \frac{1}{Z} = \frac{1}{R}+\frac{i}{\omega L}-i\omega C

where the time dependence is e^{-i\omega t}.

 

[diazona]

Actually, it is possible to define the impedance as a real quantity, the magnitude of the complex impedance,
Z = \sqrt{R^2 + \left(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C}\right)^2}
(for series circuits) This is sometimes done in introductory EM courses. It's not as powerful a concept as the complex impedance but it still allows you to do calculations.

fluidistic, I would imagine you should know that impedance is a quantity analogous to resistance, and specifically, it has the same units as resistance, which should have told you that
Z = \frac{1}{\sqrt{R^2 + \left(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C}\right)^2}}
couldn't be right.

 

[fluidistic]

Ok thank you both.
I'll have to check out my notes.
Indeed I know that in resonance the circuit is purely resistive and the impedance have ohm's units. That's why I doubted about my notes.