Implicit differentiation: why apply the Chain Rule?

Click For Summary
Implicit differentiation allows for finding the slope of the equation y^2 = x without explicitly solving for y. By applying the Chain Rule, y is treated as a differentiable function, leading to the derivative equation 2y(dy/dx) = 1. This results in the slope dy/dx = 1/(2y). The discussion emphasizes viewing y^2 as a composite function, which aids in differentiation. Overall, implicit differentiation is a valuable technique for handling equations that are not functions in the traditional sense.
mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
641
Reaction score
349
Homework Statement
Calculate ##dy/dx## if ##y^2=x##
Relevant Equations
Chain Rule
Hi, PF

##y^2=x## is not a function, but it is possible to obtain the slope at any point ##(x,y)## of the equation without previously clearing ##y^2##. It's enough to differentiate respect to ##x## the two members, treat ##y## like a ##x## differentiable function and make use of the Chain Rule to differentiate ##y^2##:

##\dfrac{d}{dx}(y^2)=\dfrac{d}{dx}(x)##

##2y\dfrac{dy}{dx}=1##

##\dfrac{dy}{dx}=\dfrac{1}{2y}##

I can't view ##y^2## like a composite function, instead of just a quadratic expression.

Greetings!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to consider ##y^2## as the composite of two functions, namely ##t\stackrel{q}{\longmapsto} t^2## after ##x\stackrel{y}{\longmapsto} y(x)## which is ##(q\circ y)\, : \,x \longmapsto (q\circ y)(x)=q(y(x))=y(x)^2.##

Edit: This leads to an equation of the kind ##f(x)=g(x),## namely ##(q\circ y)(x)=\operatorname{id}(x)## which you differentiated on both sides.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes mcastillo356, FactChecker and Delta2
The examples of implicit differentiation are usually more complicated.
If you are specifically asking about this example, the right side is so simple that it is easy to consider x as a function of y, get the derivative dx/dy = 2y, and take the inverse, dy/dx = 1/(2y) to obtain the slope of y as a function of x.
 
  • Love
Likes mcastillo356
Fine, thanks!
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...