Importance of skin depth in radio communications

benben26
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



'Briefly explain the importance of skin depth in the context of radio communications.'

Homework Equations



1f2a683bb77843739e60e63eb3a89e23.png


The Attempt at a Solution



A guess would be that, the frequencies of the radio transmissions should be kept small so that the signal has a large skin depth and is not absorbed by obstructions easily. I'm not too sure though. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benben26 said:

Homework Statement



'Briefly explain the importance of skin depth in the context of radio communications.'

Homework Equations



1f2a683bb77843739e60e63eb3a89e23.png


The Attempt at a Solution



A guess would be that, the frequencies of the radio transmissions should be kept small so that the signal has a large skin depth and is not absorbed by obstructions easily. I'm not too sure though. Is this right?



Not really, we utilize frequencies on all the spectrum regardless of the skin depth, we just adapt different techniques to deal with different parts of the RF spectrum.

As you go higher in frequency the signal tends to travel more on the surface.

So can you expect that some component of a circuit can depend on its the surface area?
 
I don't really understand your question...the aerial?
 
So if it is the ariel, what is the importance of skin depth?
 
So we want a very small skin depth so the aerial receives the EM wave easilly and converts this into a current?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top