I Imposition of relativistic constraints on Bell's theorem

petrushkagoogol
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Bell's theorem states that super-luminal communication exists between particles that are separated by space-like separation viz. faster than light transmission of information. There is spontaneity in this. Relativistically this would amount to going back in time. The state of creation of particles with opposite spin would actually be a misrepresentation of the particle whose spin is being represented as it would be a representation of the twin as it existed as some point in the past. Quantum mechanics and uncertainty would still hold. And so would relativity too.

Do you agree ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
petrushkagoogol said:
Bell's theorem states that super-luminal communication exists between particles that are separated by space-like separation viz. faster than light transmission of information.
Bell's theorem states nothing of the kind. You will find many threads on PF discussing this.

I will close this thread and invite you to read all the material on Bell here and on @DrChinese's website. You can start new threads with further questions you have, but note that discussion of personal theories is not allowed on PF.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top