Impossible equation to solve?

  1. Hi, I know its possible to get an answer by graphing the curves and finding the point of intersection but I was wondering if there was a way to do them algebraically.

    sin(2x) = [tex]\frac{x}{2}[/tex]


    or [tex]e^{\frac{x}{8}}[/tex] = x

    Also, do these types of equations have a name?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nabeshin

    Nabeshin 2,200
    Science Advisor

    Your first equation is not solvable (in terms of elementary functions or any I know of). The equation simply is not written in a way in which it is possible to express it as a solution x=something.

    The second equation at first glance appears the same, but is actually solvable (although not in terms of elementary functions). The solution is:
    x=-8 W(-1/8)
    Where W is the Lambert W function. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert's_W_function )

    I don't know of a name for these [unsolvable] equations, I'd call em non-algebraic (not sure if that's official though).
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2009
  4. arildno

    arildno 12,015
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    They are called transcendental equations.
     
  5. Thanks for the replies.
     
  6. haha try this one. Let me know if you're interested in the problem, I actually got it from physicsforums.com.

    [tex]\left [{1 \over 2}\sqrt{1 - n^2x^2} + {\arcsin (nx) \over 2n} \right ]_{0}^{6} = e + \pi[/tex]

    n=?
     
  7. And what are the 0 and 6 ??
     
  8. HallsofIvy

    HallsofIvy 40,241
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I assume that he means that formula evaluated between 6 and 0: its value at 6 minus its value at 0 is equal to [itex]e+ \pi[/itex].
     
  9. of course. Its an integral remember?

    [tex] \int_0^{6}\sqrt{1 - (nx)^2}dx = e + \pi[/tex]
     
  10. I'm still in high school so is that possible to solve using my level of mathematics?

    After I subbed the numbers in, I did a quick sketch on graphmatica and it didn't show any intersections between

    [tex] y = \sqrt{1-36n^{2}} +\frac{arcsin (6n)}{n} -1 [/tex]

    and y = 2e + 2pi

    so have I done something wrong already?
     
  11. I agree that there is no solution to

    [tex]\left [{1 \over 2}\sqrt{1 - n^2x^2} + {\arcsin (nx) \over 2n} \right ]_{0}^{6} = e + \pi[/tex]


    However, there is a solution to

    [tex] \int_0^{6}\sqrt{1 - (nx)^2}\,dx = e + \pi[/tex]

    camilus is mistaken in asserting that these are equal.
     
  12. The equations in the first post can't be solved explicitly for x, but you could use a method of iteration to get as accurate a solution for x as you require.
     
  13. wtf? explain..?

    [tex] \int_0^{6}\sqrt{1 - (nx)^2}\dx = \left [{1 \over 2}\sqrt{1 - n^2x^2} + {\arcsin (nx) \over 2n} \right ]_{0}^{6} = e + \pi[/tex]

    now you gotta find what value of n will make will make the integral equal to e + pi. I have found n to several digits, although Im under the impression that n is nonalgebraic.
     
  14. Mentallic

    Mentallic 3,657
    Homework Helper

    [tex]\int_0^{6}\sqrt{1 - (nx)^2}\dx \neq \left [{1 \over 2}\sqrt{1 - n^2x^2} + {\arcsin (nx) \over 2n} \right ]_{0}^{6}[/tex]

    Now, I can't actually explain because I don't know how to evaluate the integral, but I did go about it backwards and derived the result. They're not equal from what I can see.
     
  15. the integral should be

    [tex]
    \int \sqrt{1-(nx)^2}\,dx =\frac{1}{2}\;x\;\sqrt{1-(nx)^2} +
    \frac{1}{2n}\;\arcsin({nx)
    [/tex]

    notice the extra [tex]x[/tex]?
     
  16. uart

    uart 2,751
    Science Advisor

    It is relatively easy to show that:

    [tex]\int \sqrt{1 - (nx)^2}\, dx = {1 \over 2} x \sqrt{1 - n^2x^2} + {\arcsin (nx) \over 2n}[/tex]

    Two methods come to mind.

    Method 1.

    Substitute [itex]nx = \sin(u)[/tex] and it transforms into [itex]1/n \int \cos^2(u) du[/itex]. Then just use the trig identity cos^2(u) = 1/2 + 1/2 * cos(2u) and it's straight forward to get the above stated result.


    Method 2. (A little more complicated but avoids need for trig identities and "trig of inverse trig" simplifications).

    Note that [tex]\sqrt{1-(nx)^2} = 1/ \sqrt{1-(nx)^2} \, - \, (nx)^2 / \sqrt{1-(nx)^2} [/tex]. The first term is pretty much a standard inverse sin integral and the second term is amenable to integration by parts. This is actually one of those integration by part problems where you end up with the original integral on both the left and right hand side of the equals sign and it simplifies down pretty easily (again to give the above stated result).

    Edit. Yes thanks g_edgar. I didn't notice that missing x before.
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2009
  17. Mentallic

    Mentallic 3,657
    Homework Helper

    No uart, you are wrong here. g_edgar posted the correct integral and I was able to confirm it for myself by again differentiating the result.

    Funny how it can be relatively easy to show the wrong answer :tongue:
     
  18. uart

    uart 2,751
    Science Advisor

    Yes it's a relatively easy integral. I posted two ways to do it (and have done it many times in the past) but no I didn't actually do the calculations this time as the expression looked correct (as in it looked that same as what I've got in the past when I've actually done the integral rather than just describing the method to use). Sorry I didn't notice that the "x" was missing in the expression you posted.
     
  19. Actually, the task is to solve for n

    [tex]\sqrt{1-36n^{2}} +\frac{arcsin (6n)}{n} -\frac{1}{2}-\frac{arcsin(0)}{2n}= e+\pi
    [/tex]

    [tex]6n=sin(x)[/tex]

    [tex]n=\frac{sin(x)}{6}[/tex]

    [tex]\sqrt{1-sin^2(x)} + \frac{6x}{sin(x)} - \frac{1}{2} = e+ \pi[/tex]

    [tex]cos(x)+\frac{6x}{sin(x)}=e+\pi + \frac{1}{2}[/tex]
     
  20. uart

    uart 2,751
    Science Advisor

    Yes we knew that. :)


    And with the corrected equation that would be,

    [tex]3 \sqrt{1-36n^2} + {\frac {\sin^{-1}(6n)} {2n} = \pi + e [/tex]

    Which is still a transendental equation. (that is, no closed form solution in terms of standard functions). Numerically n=0.0617 to 3 significant figures.
     
  21. Look at my way of solving, it's much easier. Yes, I know that it is still transcendental equation.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook