Impressive harmonic motion demonstration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a YouTube video showcasing 15 pendulums that create intricate patterns through harmonic motion, with the longest pendulum oscillating 51 times in 60 seconds and each subsequent shorter pendulum oscillating one more time. Participants debate how to define a "pattern," suggesting it could be based on the positions of the pendulums at maximum or minimum potential energy. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of this definition and a realization that the demonstration exemplifies aliasing rather than simple harmonic motion. The complexity of the patterns and the meticulous adjustments made to the pendulum lengths are acknowledged as key to the visual effect. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of quantifying the number of distinct patterns created during the oscillations.
Q_Goest
Science Advisor
Messages
3,012
Reaction score
42
The YouTube video here will get you to think a bit. Basically, 15 separate pendulums that create various patterns:
The period of one complete cycle of the dance is 60 seconds. The length of the longest pendulum has been adjusted so that it executes 51 oscillations in this 60 second period. The length of each successive shorter pendulum is carefully adjusted so that it executes one additional oscillation in this period. Thus, the 15th pendulum (shortest) undergoes 65 oscillations.
I wonder though if you could say how many given patterns are created. Not sure how to describe that... what do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess we should start with defining "pattern".

In the past I was playing with some strange curves plotted on the screen, varying their phase differences and so on. Effects can be mesmerizing.
 
Borek said:
I guess we should start with defining "pattern".
How about this. Let's call the position of anyone of the balls a maximum when it is at a maximum potential energy (highest upward motion) and a minimum when it is at a lowest potential energy (hanging straight down). Given these two locations, a pattern might be defined as a state at which all the balls are either at a maximum or minimum and not somewhere in between.

Any other ideas for defining a pattern? And once the pattern is defined, I wonder how many there could be in the course of 60 seconds... my brain is refusing to even consider the math right now.

Edit: Watching the movie again, I don't think that definition of a pattern is going to work! hmmm...
 
Last edited:
As the article says, it is an example of aliasing or beating, rather than SHM or a 'wave'. The position of each of the balls is observed relative to a 'timebase', set by the front one.
It is fun to watch but very easy to misinterpret, I think.
The rule for the pattern depends on the decrement in the pendulum lengths. They have done a lot of trial and error, I think, to get such a lovely demo.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top