Improve Bicycle Braking System with Momentum Research - Luke Mace

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Luke Mace is researching ways to improve bicycle braking systems, focusing on user reluctance to use the front brake due to fears of flipping over the handlebars. He seeks to calculate the minimum speed required for momentum to counteract the reaction force that could lead to a fall. A suggested formula involves equating potential energy change to initial kinetic energy to determine this speed. Additionally, it is noted that the loss of steering control from a locked front wheel may pose a greater risk than the fear of flipping. Effective braking techniques, such as shifting body weight, can help prevent accidents while using the front brake.
lmace
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello to everyone this is my first post on this website but have used it before and found existing posts and answers very helpfull. i am a engineer at bourneouth university studying BSc Computer aided product design, i am currently working on research into a bicycle braking system to improve the users use of the front brake. Even though the front brake is the most efficant of the brakes users are relutant to use it as they are scared to use it because of the danger of flipping the bicycle.
i would like to be able to work out the mimium speed a user would have to be traveling at to allow the momentum to overcome the reaction force of the users arms and center of mass, to force them over handle bars by angular momentum of the locked wheel.

any help would be very much appriacated.

aplogies for grammer/ spelling i am a designer not english student.

regards luke mace
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok the question seems relatively straight forward so I'll answer it first. But after that I'd like to suggest why fear of going "over the handlebars" is not necessarily the main concern with front brakes on a bicycle.

First the question. I'd say all you need to do is to find the change in PE to raise the center of mass of the bike and rider to the "flipping point" and equate that to the initial KE to solve this.

Assuming that the center of mass of the bike and rider is at a distance "a" above the front axle and distance "b" to the rear of the front axle then equation I get is :

1/2 m v^2 = mg ( \sqrt{a^2 + b^2} - a )

So

v_{\max} = \sqrt{2g( \sqrt{a^2 + b^2} - a)}

Personally I think that the loss of steering that you get if the front wheel locks up is more of a concern than the flipping issue. As you know the steering on a bicycle is an essential part of how you maintain stability, with the rider continuously making minor corrections to the steering in order to keep his center of mass correctly positioned and therefore the bike upright. I know from painful experience that it only takes a momentary loss of steering (due to front wheel lock) when descending on a loose surface before you can end up in a unrecoverable position and the bike goes down.
 
Last edited:
Usually the brakes on a road bike aren't strong enough to lock up the front. For fast braking, I simply raise myself up a bit and shove the bicycle forward so the seat is under my lower abdomen, moving the center of mass back to prevent flipping over. Mountain bikes on the other hand, at least the ones with disc brakes can lock up the front tire.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top