In a barometer, if we replaced the mercury with alcohol and water?

AI Thread Summary
In a barometer, replacing mercury with alcohol and water leads to different displacement behaviors due to density differences. Alcohol, with a density of 800 kg/m^3, is less dense than water's 1000 kg/m^3, allowing it to be displaced further under the same pressure conditions. The pressure at the bottom of a liquid column is calculated using the formula P = ρgh, where ρ is the density, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the column. This principle explains why alcohol can rise higher in the barometer compared to water when equal pressure is applied. Understanding these fluid dynamics is crucial for accurate barometric measurements.
shangriphysics
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
In a barometer, assuming bernoulie properties(incompressible fluid) if we replaced the mercury with alcohol and water why would the alcohol be able to be displaced further with pressure. It has a lower density that water 800kg/m^3 than water which has 1000kg/m3.

What chemical properties or properties due to density would give us the result where alcohol can be moved up further when we apply the same pressure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the pressure at the bottom of a liquid column of a height h and a density ρ?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top