In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the operation of railguns, specifically how the Lorentz force propels objects using electromagnetic forces generated by current flowing through the rails. It clarifies that non-magnetic metals like aluminum can be effectively used for both rails and armature due to their excellent electrical conductivity, rather than their magnetic properties. The magnetic field is created by the current itself, making the use of ferromagnetic materials unnecessary. Additionally, aluminum's lower density compared to steel allows for faster acceleration of projectiles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lorentz force and its application in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of electrical conductivity and its significance in railgun design
  • Familiarity with the properties of metals, particularly aluminum and copper
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic fields and their generation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of railguns and their operational mechanics
  • Explore the effects of different materials on railgun performance
  • Learn about the role of current in generating magnetic fields in conductive materials
  • Investigate the potential of maglev technology in projectile propulsion systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists interested in electromagnetism, railgun technology, and advanced projectile propulsion systems.

Bugmenot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bugmenot said:
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
You are interested in the ability of the metal to conduct electricity. The magnetic field is due to the current in the rail and projectile/armature. The design does not allow for the use of high permeability core material since there is no core.

AM
 
Bugmenot said:
In a railgun the lorentz force causes an object to be propelled in a direction because of an electromagnetic force caused by running a current through the "rails". How come you can use aluminium or another such non-magnetic metal as both rails and armature? Surely only a magentic metal would work?
First of all, Al is cheap/inexpensive.

The effect is I x B, and B is induced by the currents in the rails, so a magnetic material is not necessary.

Al is relatively low density (sg ~2.7) as compared to steel (sg ~ 8.0), so for the same size, the Al would have much less mass, and consequently for a given force, it would accelerate faster.

I have seen railguns with copper rails which were used to fire steel projectiles - up to several km/s - for a relatively short gun.
 
So, in english, what your saying is it doesn't have to be ferromagnetic to get a magnetic field. Thanks
 
The magnetic field is produced by the current in the aluminum wire and NOT by a magnetic moment in a permanent magnet. Therefore, conductivity of the conductor is what is important, an Al is a very good conductor, and it is cheap.
 
Why can't they use maglev to fire projectiles?

No contact, no friction!
 
Probably because you would have to have a very long vacuum tube from your device to your target for it to make any significant difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K