In dire need of good statistics book.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Statistics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a clearer introduction to distribution functions in the context of modern physics, particularly related to Planck's discoveries. The original physics book is criticized for not adequately explaining these concepts, especially for someone without a statistics background but with knowledge of calculus. Participants are encouraged to share resources or links that provide a more thorough yet accessible explanation of distribution functions, with one suggested link being a book available on Amazon that is noted for its brevity. The emphasis is on finding materials that effectively bridge the gap between calculus and the statistical concepts necessary for understanding modern physics.
Fizex
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I'm learning modern physics and my book starts out with teaching distribution functions, but not to well. I need an intro that is not afraid to use an integral, but yet does not breeze through it as fast as this physics book. The book wants to know distribution functions to learn about plank's discoveries. I have never taken statistics before but I do know calculus.

If you have a very very good link to a website to explain this stuff that's fine too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top