In QM: How to derive <x|f> from f_n(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the representation of quantum states in position space, specifically how to express the function f_n(x) in terms of the notation . The context is quantum mechanics, focusing on energy eigenstates and their representations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between f_n(x) and the notation , with some asserting that f_n(x) is equivalent to . Questions arise regarding the meaning of "abstract number basis" and "concrete position representation," and whether these terms refer to f_n(x) and the sum of f_n(x) over all n, respectively.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications and corrections. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equivalence of certain representations, but there remains uncertainty about the terminology used in the problem statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion due to terminology, such as the distinction between abstract and concrete representations. There is also acknowledgment of language barriers affecting communication.

mishla
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you have a function f_n(x), how do you get the equivalent representation <x|f>?


Homework Equations



I have a system with a given Hamiltonian (not in matrix-form), from which I derived the specter of energy eigenvalues E_n, and the corresponding energy eigenfunctions f_n(x). However, I am asked to derive the eigenstates in the form <x|f> also, how do I do that?


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
f_n(x) is equivalent to [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex]
 
By the way, it is "spectrum", not "specter". Although, with Halloween coming, it may be appropriate!

As gabbagabbahey said, f_n(x) IS [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex] . <x, f> is the sum of [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex] over all n.
 
Thanks for the answers! So what is then meant by

“When you have found the spectrum of energy-eigenvalues, find the corresponding energy-eigenstates, both the abstract number basis and the concrete position-representation <x|f>.”?

Is “the abstract number basis” the same as f_n(x) (the one I have found)? And is “the concrete position representation <x|f>” then the sum of f_n(x) over all n?

And thanks for the correction of my misspelling, English is not my mother tounge…
 
Suppose one of the energy eigenstates in some abstract basis was

[tex]|f_1 \rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |x \rangle -\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |y \rangle[/tex]

Then in the concrete basis it would be [itex]f_1(x)=\langle x|f_1 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K