In the bionomial expansion (1+x)^p

  • Thread starter Thread starter suku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
suku
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In the bionomial expansion (1+x)^p , p can be integer or fraction. The coefficients are written as p
C
j . For this to hold p>= j. (j= integer). What happens if p=1/2,-1/2 or any other fraction? How can one use the same combination coefficient formula?

tks for any hlp.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Is that true?

As far as I know, you cannot write
\sqrt{1 + x} = (1 + x)^{1/2}
as
a 1^{1/2} + b x^{1/2} = a + b \sqrt{x}
for any numbers a, b, for example.

You can write it as
\sqrt{1 + x} = a_0 + a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + \cdots
but not with a finite series and an then have little to do with binomial coefficients.

The fact that it works with integers, is simply because you can open the brackets in, say, (1 + x)n = (1 + x)(1 + x)...(1 + x) [n times], and the coefficient of 1k xn-k is simply the number of ways in which you can choose k of the brackets whose 1 you multiply with the other n - k brackets' x, which is by definition n choose k.
 


suku said:
What happens if p=1/2,-1/2 or any other fraction?

You need infinitely many terms in that case. Just continue to generate terms the usual way.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top