In the interacting scalar field theory, I have a question.

lhcQFT
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
First of all, I copy the text in my lecture note.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In general, $$e^{-iTH}$$ cannot be written exactly in a useful way in terms of creation and annihilation operators. However, we can do it perturbatively, order by order in the coupling $$ \lambda $$. For example, let us consider the contribution linear in $$ \lambda $$. We use the definition of the exponential to write:

$$ e^{-iTH} = [1-iHT/N]^N = [1-i(H_0 + H_{\text{int}})T/N]^N $$ - - - (1)

for $$ N \rightarrow \infty $$. Now, the part of this that is linear in $$ H_{\text{int}} $$ can be expanded as:

$$ e^{-iTH} = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} [1-iH_0T/N]^{N-n-1}(-iH_{\text{int}}T/N)[1-iH_0T/N]^n $$ - - - (2)

(Here, we have dropped the 0th order part, $$ e^{-iTH_0} $$, as uninteresting; it just corresponds to the particles evolving as free particles.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
So, my question is how do I derive from eq. (1) to (2)? If you teach me the method, I really thank you.

p.s. In this environment, inline math mode is not worked. Sorry for inconvenient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just write out the product of the N terms and keep terms linear in the interaction Hamiltonian.
 
lhcQFT said:
p.s. In this environment, inline math mode is not worked. Sorry for inconvenient.

Set off your equations using ## instead of $$ and they will display inline.
 
Take eg N=2 and N=3 and try then a general N...
I think from the N=2 and N=3 you will be able to see what is going on...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top