In What Frame Is (t2 - t1)^2 Measured?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Best of the Worst
  • Start date Start date
Best of the Worst
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
T = root((t2 - t1)^2 - (x2 - x1)^2)

As I understand it, T is proper time as measured in someone's intertial frame, and (x2 - x1)^2 is their movement through space... but in what frame is (t2 - t1)^2 measured?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
t1,x1 and t2,x2 are both measured in somenone (anyone's) inertial frame.

Regardless of which inertial frame you chose to measure t1,x1,t2, and x2, the result T will be the same - it will be invariant.
 
Awesome. Thank you kindly ;).
 
Best of the Worst said:
T = root((t2 - t1)^2 - (x2 - x1)^2)

As I understand it, T is proper time as measured in someone's intertial frame, and (x2 - x1)^2 is their movement through space... but in what frame is (t2 - t1)^2 measured?
Please note that

\Deltas2 = (t2 - t1)2 - (x2 - x1)2

may be either positive, negative or zero. \Deltas2 may be either a proper time or a proper distance according to its sign.

Pete
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top