Struggling with Math Problems in Apostol's Book - What Should I Do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When encountering unsolved problems in a math book, such as Apostol's "Mathematical Analysis," it's common to feel uncertain about one's readiness for the material. Many learners experience difficulty with certain problems, and it's normal not to solve every exercise. It's suggested to keep notes on unsolved problems and revisit them later, as some may become clearer with further study. Engaging with specific cases, like substituting particular values for complex numbers, can also provide insights. Additionally, it's noted that textbooks often include challenging problems intentionally, and seeking help from forums can be beneficial for tackling difficult questions. Overall, struggling with a few problems does not indicate a lack of preparedness; rather, it is part of the learning process in advanced mathematics.
uman
Messages
348
Reaction score
1
Hi all. What do you do when you are reading a math book and there are multiple problems you can't solve in a chapter?

For example, I am trying to learn from Apostol's book "Mathematical Analysis". In the problems at the end of the first chapter there are two that I haven't been able to figure out how to solve. It seems like the solution should be so simple but I'm just not seeing it. (There are two more I haven't attempted yet, but I think I can solve them.) Does this mean I'm not ready for the book and should get an easier one? Or is not being able to solve a couple problems in a chapter normal?

In case anyone's wondering, here's one of the problems I haven't been able to figure out:

Let w be a given complex number. If w\not=\pm 1, show that there exist two values of z=x + iy satisfying the conditions cos(z)=w and -\pi<x\leq\pi.

The identity cos(z) = cos(-z) says that if there is one such z, there have to be two... Other than that I'm at a loss.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
uman said:
Hi all. What do you do when you are reading a math book and there are multiple problems you can't solve in a chapter?
I keep a set of notes per book with a section with problems that I can't solve.

Does this mean I'm not ready for the book and should get an easier one? Or is not being able to solve a couple problems in a chapter normal?
If you're able to solve all the problems in the book without trouble, I would say the book was too easy.

Let w be a given complex number. If w\not=\pm 1, show that there exist two values of z=x + iy satisfying the conditions cos(z)=w and -\pi<x\leq\pi.

The identity cos(z) = cos(-z) says that if there is one such z, there have to be two... Other than that I'm at a loss.
Try to solve a more specific problem, say w = 0, w = i, or w = 1 + i. This should provide you with some insight.
 
uman said:
For example, I am trying to learn from Apostol's book "Mathematical Analysis". In the problems at the end of the first chapter there are two that I haven't been able to figure out how to solve. It seems like the solution should be so simple but I'm just not seeing it. (There are two more I haven't attempted yet, but I think I can solve them.) Does this mean I'm not ready for the book and should get an easier one? Or is not being able to solve a couple problems in a chapter normal?
Personally I don't know of anyone who is able to solve every single problem in a given textbook. Usually the authors would throw in a few difficult ones for every chapter's exercises. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't attempt to solve them.
 
Thanks for the encouragement. The first chapter was starting to get boring (as "first chapters" tend to do) so I decided to move on and come back to try to solve those problems again later.

One of the ones I didn't attempt was proving the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for complex numbers (the book gives a hint that looks like it makes this reasonably easy although I haven't tried) which according to the book is an extremely important result in analysis... so I may have to come back to that sooner rather than later, lol.
 
You can also try posting the questions and your attempt at solutions in the homework help section of this forum.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top