Indefinite Integral - By parts works right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the function \(\int (x+2)/(x²+x+1) dx\) using integration by parts. The original poster, RoganSarine, initially attempted to solve the integral using the formula \(uv - \int v du\) but questioned the correctness of their approach. A participant provided an alternative method involving completing the square for the denominator, transforming it into \((x + 1/2)² + 3/4\), and suggested breaking the numerator into two parts for easier integration. This method is confirmed as a more effective approach to solving the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of completing the square for quadratic expressions.
  • Basic skills in manipulating algebraic fractions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in detail, focusing on its applications.
  • Learn how to complete the square for quadratic functions, particularly in integration contexts.
  • Explore partial fraction decomposition as a technique for integrating rational functions.
  • Practice integrating functions with polynomial numerators and denominators to reinforce understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as educators seeking to explain complex integration methods effectively.

RoganSarine
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Nevermind, it's late and I realized why it doesn't work because I forgot to take into consideration that the denominator is (1/polynomial)

Anyone care to explain to me how to do it the proper way?



1. Question 1

\int (x+2)/(x²+x+1) dx

The only reason I ask is because my teacher showed us another way which basically involves breaking the numerator up, and completing the square in the bottom... which I really don't care to learn. The answer DOES look nicer, but I just want to make sure my way is correct also.

The Attempt at a Solution



uv - \intvdu

u = x+2
du = 1

dv = x²+x+1
v = (1/3)x^3 + (1/2)x^2 + x

(x+2)[(1/3)x^3 + (1/2)x^2 + x] - \int [ (1/3)x^3 + (1/2)x^2 + x ] (1)

(x+2)[(1/3)x^3 + (1/2)x^2 + x] - [(1/4)x^4 -(1/6)x^3 + (1/2)x^2] + C

As I said... Not really pretty by any means, but isn't that technically also correct?[/s]

 
Physics news on Phys.org
RoganSarine said:
Anyone care to explain to me how to do it the proper way?

Hi RoganSarine! :smile:

(x+2)/(x²+x+1)

= (x+2)/((x + 1/2)² + 3/4)

= (x + 1/2)/((x + 1/2)² + 3/4) + (3/2)/((x + 1/2)² + 3/4) …

now integrate (you'll need a different method for each part :wink:)
 
I can see where to get most of that equation but that last part:

(x+2)/(x²+x+1)

(x+1/2+3/2)/(x²+1/2+1/4-1/4)+1)
(x+1/2+3/2)/((x+1/2)²+1-1/4)
(x+1/2+3/2)/((x+1/2)²+3/4)


But...Oh nevermind.

Wow, ha ha... I've never had to break up an equation like that before (like, breaking up the numerator also, seriously?). I'll give it a shot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K