Indefinite number of neutrons?

bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have a very basic question regarding the nucleus.

I understand why you can only have a limited number of protons within the nucleus - more and more protons within the nucleus will increase the coulomb potential and cause the nucleus to be unstable.

But why is this so for neutrons? Why couldn't I have an isotope of 50-O? The nuclear force is equally strong for n-n connections, as n-p, and p-p, so what's stopping the nucleus from having an a very large number of neutrons? When you look at a table of stable nuclides, it's pretty easy to see that most stable nuclides have equal #'s of protons and neutrons, but why is this needed? What am I missing?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also check out neutron drip line.

And also, n-n can not be bound.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top