Independent variables of the Lagrangian

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, y and y' are treated as independent variables in the context of the Lagrangian because they are considered independent algebraically, despite being related through differentiation. The question arises about the implications of differentiating f' to g' and whether df/dg is independent of g', leading to a deeper examination of the relationship between variables in calculus of variations. Some participants suggest that y and y' represent boundary values, reinforcing their perceived independence. The conversation also explores the idea of binding velocities instead of positions, prompting further inquiry into the nature of these variables. Overall, the treatment of y and y' as independent is a foundational aspect of the mathematical framework used in the Lagrangian formulation.
JanEnClaesen
Messages
59
Reaction score
4
Why are y and y' treated as independent variables, while they are not?

Another slightly related question:
if ' = d/dt then df'/dg' = df/dg because f' = df/dg g', but if we differentiate f' to g' we implicitly assume that df/dg is independent of g', is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps because y and y' are the values of y and y' at the boundaries of a path, in which case they do seem independent.
Hence a natural follow-up question, instead of binding the positions, why don't we bind the velocities?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top