Indications that you don't enjoy a field of maths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
Signs of disinterest in a specific area of mathematics include apathy, reduced motivation, and declining performance, creating a negative feedback loop that diminishes enjoyment. If competency in that area is necessary, it may be beneficial to push through while seeking greater understanding, which can lead to enjoyment. A common approach to gauge interest is assessing whether one can comprehend and enjoy the introductory material of a related book. However, disinterest may stem from the choice of resources rather than the subject itself, prompting individuals to explore different materials. Ultimately, a genuine interest should motivate the search for alternative resources rather than avoidance of the subject.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
What are the signs that one should show when one is not enjoying a particular area of maths? In other words how can you tell if you don't really enjoy one area of maths?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tgt said:
What are the signs that one should show when one is not enjoying a particular area of maths? In other words how can you tell if you don't really enjoy one area of maths?

You can show signs of apathy when encountering that area of maths which can reduce your motivation ,understanding and performance and this can lead into a vicious circle where your enjoyment reduces even further.If it is necessary for you to be competent in the areas you don't enjoy then the best bet is to take a deep breath and get on with it.Enjoyment may come with greater understanding.I think people who enjoy all areas of their subject are rather rare.
 
The rule I've been applying is whether I can comprehend and enjoy the introduction section of the book about the field. Is that too shallow?
 
tgt said:
The rule I've been applying is whether I can comprehend and enjoy the introduction section of the book about the field. Is that too shallow?

Maybe it's just that particular book that you don't like?
 
dx said:
Maybe it's just that particular book that you don't like?

Nah. If the interest is genuine then surely the person will try to find another book on the same topic. That's what I am doing at the moment.
 
If you cut yourself to avoid doing math problems, you probably don't like that particular field of math.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
112
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top