Induction Proofs Homework: Prove ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keen94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proofs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n using mathematical induction. The proof starts by verifying the base case for n=1, confirming that the formula holds true. The inductive step assumes the formula is valid for k and demonstrates it for k+1 by manipulating combinations. Participants also discuss the significance of combinations in counting subsets and relate the formula to the binomial theorem, highlighting its historical discovery by Newton. The proof is deemed mostly correct, with suggestions for clearer notation in the sums.
Keen94
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

Homework Equations


Defn. of a combination.
Defn. of mathematical induction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula is true for n=1
2=∑j=01 n C r
= 1 C 0 +1 C 1
=1 + 1
= 2
Now assume that for some k∈ℕ and 0≤ j ≤ k we have
2k = ∑kj=0 (k C j)
Then
(2)(2k)=2k+1= (2)kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑k+1j=0 (k C j-1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j-1) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 [ (k C j) + (k Cj-1) ] +(k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k+1 C j) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑k+1j=0 (k+1 C j)

Does everything check? In addition, how was this formula discovered? How do people even find these things? Thanks again for the help guys and gals.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems OK, although it would be cleaner to adjust the ## j=0 ## starting point in some of your sums - these work if you define ## _k C _j= 0## for ## j=-1 ## but if you are using that you should say so.

Otherwise I don't know how it was discovered but one way to see it directly is to note that ## _n C _k ## is the number of subsets of ## k ## elements of a set having ## n ## elements, and ## 2^n ## is the number of all subsets of a set having ## n ## elements.
 
Last edited:
wabbit said:
Seems OK, although it would be cleaner to adjust the ## j=0 ## starting point in some of your sums - these work if you define ## k C j= 0## for ## j=-1 ## but if you are using that you should say so.

Otherwise I don't know how it was discovered but one way to see it directly is to note that ## n C k ## is the number of subsets of ## k ## elements of a set having ## n ## elements, and ## 2^n ## is the number of all subsets of a set having ## n ## elements.
thanks for the reply. I forgot that nCr is the number of subsets of k elements of a set of n elements. I've seen other proofs for that.
 
Keen94 said:

Homework Statement


Prove that ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

Homework Equations


Defn. of a combination.
Defn. of mathematical induction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula is true for n=1
2=∑j=01 n C r
= 1 C 0 +1 C 1
=1 + 1
= 2
Now assume that for some k∈ℕ and 0≤ j ≤ k we have
2k = ∑kj=0 (k C j)
Then
(2)(2k)=2k+1= (2)kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑k+1j=0 (k C j-1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j-1) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 [ (k C j) + (k Cj-1) ] +(k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k+1 C j) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑k+1j=0 (k+1 C j)

Does everything check? In addition, how was this formula discovered? How do people even find these things? Thanks again for the help guys and gals.

People discover these thing by first discovering the binomial theorem
(1+x)^n = \sum_{k=0}^m {}_nC_k \, x^k
and then putting ##x = 1##.

Newton discovered that result in 1665, before age 25.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top