Inelastic collision and Kinetic Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision, a 900-kg car traveling east at 15.0 m/s collides with a 750-kg car traveling north at 20.0 m/s, resulting in the cars sticking together. Momentum is conserved in both the x and y components, allowing for the calculation of the wreckage's speed post-collision using the equation m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2)vfinal. For the second scenario, a 1.80-kg block compresses a spring after sliding on a rough surface, with kinetic friction affecting its motion. The force constant of the spring can be determined using energy conservation principles, factoring in the work done against friction. Overall, both scenarios illustrate the principles of momentum conservation and energy transformation in physics.
stonnn
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1)
A 900-kg car traveling east at 15.0 m/s collides with a 750-kg car traveling north at 20.0 m/s. The cars stick together. What is the speed of the wreckage just after the collision?

Relevant equations: m1v1 - m2v2 = (m1+ m2) vfinal
My attempt: This is an inelastic collision because the cars collide and stick together. So, momentum is conserved but kinetic energy is not.



2)A 1.80-kg block slides on a rough horizontal surface. The block hits a spring with a speed
of 2.00 m/s and compresses it a distance of 11.0 cm before coming to rest. If the coefficient
of kinetic friction between the block and the surface is μk = 0.560, what is the force
constant of the spring?

My attempt:

1/2mv2 - Mgd - 1/2kx = 0
mv2 -Mg
[(1.80kg)(2m/s)(2m/s) - (0.560)(10)]/0.1meters
k = 16 n x m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For #1, momentum is conserved in its components.

m1v1x + m2v2x = (m1+ m2) v'x
m1v1y + m2v2y = (m1+ m2) v'y

The car traveling north has no velocity in the x-direction and similarly, the car heading east has no velocity in the y-direction.

Solve both equations to get the components on the velocity after the collision and use pythagoream theorem to solve for the final velocity and the direction
 
thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top