MHB Can you prove the inequality challenge?

AI Thread Summary
The inequality challenge requires proving that for any real number x greater than or equal to 1/2 and any positive integer n, the expression x^(2n) is greater than or equal to (x-1)^(2n) + (2x-1)^n. The discussion highlights the use of the binomial expansion to establish that (a+b)^n is greater than or equal to a^n + b^n when a and b are positive. By substituting a = 2x - 1 and b = (x - 1)^2, the inequality simplifies to x^(2n) being greater than or equal to (2x - 1)^n + (x - 1)^(2n). This approach effectively demonstrates the validity of the original inequality. The conversation concludes with acknowledgment of the contributions made by participants.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $x\ge \dfrac{1}{2}$ be a real number and $n$ a positive integer. Prove that $x^{2n}\ge (x-1)^{2n}+(2x-1)^n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $x\ge \dfrac{1}{2}$ be a real number and $n$ a positive integer. Prove that $x^{2n}\ge (x-1)^{2n}+(2x-1)^n$.
[sp]If $a$ and $b$ are positive then $(a+b)^n \geqslant a^n+b^n$ (because the binomial expansion of the left side consists of the two terms on the right side, together with other terms which are all positive). Put $a=2x-1$ and $b = (x-1)^2$. Then $a+b = x^2$ and the inequality becomes $x^{2n} \geqslant (2x-1)^n + (x-1)^{2n}.$ [/sp]
 
Well done, Opalg(Yes) and thanks for participating!:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top