Inequality proof (Spivak 1.6-b)

  • Thread starter Thread starter carlosbgois
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if x < y and n is odd, then x^n < y^n. Three cases are analyzed: Case 1 shows that for non-negative x and y, the difference y - x leads to y^n > x^n through positive multiplication. Case 2 establishes that if x is negative and y is positive, then x^n is negative while y^n is positive, confirming y^n > x^n. Case 3 is addressed by noting that if both x and y are negative, the transformation of variables leads to a similar conclusion using the results from Case 1. The overall consensus is that the proofs for Cases 1 and 2 are solid, and Case 3 can be resolved with a straightforward application of previous findings.
carlosbgois
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if x < y, and n is odd, then x^{n}< y^{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt was to solve three different cases:

Case 1: If 0 \leq x < y, we have

y-x > 0
y*y*...*y > 0 (closure of the positive numbers under multiplication)
x*x*...*x \geq 0

y^{n}-x^{n} = (y-x)(y^{n-1} + y^{n-2}x +...+ yx^{n-2} + x^{n-1})

So, as every piece of the second member of this last equation is positive, their sums and multiplications are also positive, hence proving that y^{n} > x^{n}


Case 2: If x\leq 0 < y, we have: x^{j} \leq 0 (j is odd), and also y^{j} > 0, which is the same as -y^{j} < 0. Now, as we have closure under sum, then x^{n} + (-y^{n}) < 0, so y^{n} > x^{n}


Case 3: If x < y \leq 0 ... ?


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Are my proofs of case 1 and 2 ok? What should I do in case 3?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (2), if x< 0< y, for odd n, if x^n&lt; 0 and 0&lt; y^n. That's all you need to say.

For (3), if x< y< 0, then -x> -y> 0. And, of course, for n odd, (-x)^n= -x^n. Use (1) that you have already proved.
 
Thanks! It's actually simple, but sometimes I find hard to have these insights.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top