Inequality - Proof that √(a^2)<√(b^2) does not imply a<b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Akitirija
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the mathematical statement that √(a^2) < √(b^2) does not imply a < b, illustrated by the counterexample of a = 1 and b = -2. Participants clarify that the book's example serves as a disproof rather than a formal proof. The distinction between proving and disproving statements is emphasized, noting that providing a single counterexample suffices to disprove an "if-then" statement. The original poster expresses a desire for a deeper algebraic understanding and seeks guidance on relevant topics to study. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding proofs and disproofs in mathematics.
Akitirija
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

First of all thank you for a great forum! I downloaded the app and find it ingenious!

The problem stated above is from "3000 Solved Problems in Calculus".

The book solves this problem simply by stating: "No. Let a=1 and b=-2".

However, I am curious to know if it is possible to provide a more algebraic proof, or of this is the only way to prove it. As I really cannot provide any attempts of my own, I will just ask if anyone know what topic I have to study in order to find the answer. If I fail after that, I will return to you again.

(Maybe it should be mentioned that I am interested in doing Calculus 1,but I want the fundamentals in order first.) Yours sincerely,
Aki
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am puzzled by this. Are you saying that this proof is too simple and you want a harder proof?

The problem is to show that "if \sqrt{a^2}&lt; \sqrt{b^2} then a< b" is NOT true. A standard way to show that an "if-then" statement is not true is to give a "counter example". While no number of "examples" will show that such a statement is true one example in which it does not work is enough to show that it is NOT true.
 
Ah, cool! I see your point. I'm not really used to proofs at all. Thank you very much for the quick reply!
 
Akitirija said:
Ah, cool! I see your point. I'm not really used to proofs at all. Thank you very much for the quick reply!

Just to be clear: what the book gave was not a "proof", it was a "disproof". Even if you do not know how to do proofs you may be able to do disproofs, as they are very different concepts.
 
I see. Thank you for the clarification!
 

Thread 'Family of lines that are at a distance of 5 from the origin'

I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
View full post »

Similar threads

Need help in manipulating rational absolute value inequalities
Replies
11
Views
2K
Can You Solve This Proof Involving Inequalities and Negations?
Replies
10
Views
3K
An inequality involving ##x## on both sides: ##\sqrt{x+2}\ge x##
Replies
3
Views
2K
Solving an inequality for a change of variables
Replies
15
Views
1K
Surface area of a sphere ##= \pi * (a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2)##
Replies
18
Views
2K
Matrices: if AB=A and BA=B, then B^2 is equal to?
Replies
18
Views
3K
Manipulating an inequality in the bisection method
Replies
2
Views
2K
Solve Inequality: Algebraic Proof of a<b<c<1/12
Replies
3
Views
1K
Spivak's "Calculus": AM-GM inequality problem.
Replies
6
Views
3K
Solving Simultaneous Inequalities
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top