Inertia and Density question help

  • Thread starter Thread starter SWiTCHRiDE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Inertia
AI Thread Summary
Determining the unique density distribution of the Earth based on its mass, radius, and moment of inertia is not feasible due to the lack of sufficient equations. The discussion highlights that there are multiple radial density distributions that can yield identical moments of inertia. With two variables (density and thickness) for each shell and only three equations, the system is underdetermined. The Earth's mass and radius are measurable, but its composition is primarily inferred through seismology. There is curiosity about whether the moment of inertia can be directly measured through observations like lunar effects or changes in day length.
SWiTCHRiDE
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Assuming I have the mass, radius and moment of inertia of the earth, is it possible to determine the unique density distribution of the earth? The assumtion is the Earth is composed of N shells with constant density and thickness.

I don't think so, but I am not sure why or how...other than the uniform density can be calculated.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the solution is unique. There may be many radial density distributions with identical moments of intertia
 
Well, you have 2N densities&thicknesses, and three equations as far as I can see:
1. The sum of the shell's masses equals the known mass
2. The sum of the thicknesses equals the radius
3. the sum of the moments of inertae equals the Earth's moment of inertia.

looks like a typical lack of equations to me, even for N=2! :smile:
 
SWiTCHRiDE said:
Assuming I have the mass, radius and moment of inertia of the earth
Hmm.. the radius of the Earth has long been measured, and its mass can be determined in a laboratory, but I thought the composition of the Earth was inferred from seismology - and moment of inertia perhaps from that. Of course, I wouldn't be wondering this is you wanted to calculate the density distribution of a golf ball, but is there a method of directly measuring the Earth's moment of inertia? Can you get it from simple observations of the moon and the lengthening day?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top